Note: LucasForums Archive Project
The content here was reconstructed by scraping the Wayback Machine in an effort to restore some of what was lost when LF went down. The LucasForums Archive Project claims no ownership over the content or assets that were archived on archive.org.

This project is meant for research purposes only.
 

RenegadeOfPhunk

Latest Posts

Page: 13 of 21
Posted in: OJP (Open Jedi Project)
 RenegadeOfPhunk
10-04-2003, 4:01 PM
#179
I think it would be 'convinient' if the basic distribution was kept to server-side - just because it can appear all the more transparent to the players. ...but I don't think we should make this a 'hard' requirement. If there are really cool things w...  [Read More]
Posted in: OJP (Open Jedi Project)
 RenegadeOfPhunk
10-04-2003, 9:58 AM
#175
Emon, Once your happy with the website, either let me know and I'll contact ChrisC3P0 - or you can contact Chris directly......  [Read More]
Posted in: OJP (Open Jedi Project)
 RenegadeOfPhunk
10-04-2003, 9:52 AM
#174
Looks good Razor. In relation to OJP contributors not deleting files and /or directories in the respository. I would hope the CVS would allow us to set individual user rights appropiately - so that only admins can even attempt to delete stuff......  [Read More]
Posted in: OJP (Open Jedi Project)
 RenegadeOfPhunk
10-01-2003, 8:42 AM
#157
Deciding what the rules for the OJP are - or whether we need rules in the first place - needs to be done. And it needs to be conclusive enough for everyone to agree on. So I don't see a problem with getting a bit 'involved' with that. But - hehe - t...  [Read More]
Posted in: OJP (Open Jedi Project)
 RenegadeOfPhunk
09-30-2003, 6:56 PM
#148
Emon, Depending on how long I've been away, that's a LOT of catch up, which wouldn't be nessesary in other chat programs. ...I just think other chat programs are far more practical - and just make more sense. ...did the maker of IRC not know how t...  [Read More]
Posted in: OJP (Open Jedi Project)
 RenegadeOfPhunk
09-30-2003, 1:00 PM
#145
Well - looks like IRC is the fav. Although I agree with Razor - I think it's a pain in the arse it doesn't automatically detect when someone is idle and give you some kind of an audio alert when someone joins or becomes active again. I easiely find...  [Read More]
Posted in: OJP (Open Jedi Project)
 RenegadeOfPhunk
09-29-2003, 9:36 PM
#137
ICQ supports 3 or more way conversation doesn't it? Anyway - I'm not too fussed - although I prefer ICQ, but I'm easy....  [Read More]
Posted in: OJP (Open Jedi Project)
 RenegadeOfPhunk
09-29-2003, 8:35 PM
#134
Yeah- I say use ICQ... About how we manage the two builds, well - I'm not overly fussed at the end of the day. I would have thought that we would really need to double-check all the features going into the OJP anyway - between us. In that case, th...  [Read More]
Posted in: OJP (Open Jedi Project)
 RenegadeOfPhunk
09-29-2003, 7:42 PM
#130
...well... There are two ways to approach the two distributions. btw - can we give the two distributions / builds different names? 1 and 2 don't really tell you much. I'd suggest: Dist. 1 = OJP Base Dist. 2 = OJP Plus ...or whatever. Someone can...  [Read More]
Posted in: OJP (Open Jedi Project)
 RenegadeOfPhunk
09-29-2003, 6:11 PM
#125
OK - thanks Recom. Well - from what I've read, I think the ideal set-up in the CVS system would be 'unreserved' check-outs. I guess we just need to give it a thorough testing and see how robust it is. It sounds like it should do the job... at least...  [Read More]
Posted in: OJP (Open Jedi Project)
 RenegadeOfPhunk
09-29-2003, 11:10 AM
#121
Yeap - sorry Razor, you were right - it was just a difference of terminology... Reserved and unreserved (CVS) as opposed to single and multiple (VSS). It'd be nice, recombinant, if you could confirm that for us - since you seem to be familiar wi...  [Read More]
Posted in: OJP (Open Jedi Project)
 RenegadeOfPhunk
09-29-2003, 10:23 AM
#119
AHA! Yes - 'unreserved' checkouts sounds like the CVS equivelent of the 'multiple' checkout concept I'm used to. And it looks like it's (reasonably) safe. I'd still be wise to do quick tests, but at least the concept is there... Phew! That's a reli...  [Read More]
Posted in: OJP (Open Jedi Project)
 RenegadeOfPhunk
09-29-2003, 9:33 AM
#117
I've got a message back from ChrisC3P0. He says he can give us hosting. He can't set up the forums until the website is up and running. (That's the policy). So - Emon - you may want to get in touch with Chris directly to sort out the website. Just...  [Read More]
Posted in: OJP (Open Jedi Project)
 RenegadeOfPhunk
09-28-2003, 5:56 PM
#112
I'm still waiting for a reply from ChrisC3P0. I've just sent an update request message to him......  [Read More]
Posted in: OJP (Open Jedi Project)
 RenegadeOfPhunk
09-28-2003, 4:41 PM
#109
Well - don't get me wrong - it has it's problems. Things can start to get unglued when you start branching stuff AS WELL as multiple check-outs! lol - but that's just asking for trouble anyway! At the end of the day, we've had very little trouble wi...  [Read More]
Posted in: OJP (Open Jedi Project)
 RenegadeOfPhunk
09-28-2003, 4:25 PM
#107
Subversion looks cool. I don't think it does anything like the 'multiple' checkout stuff I've been talking about (at least I couldn't see anything like that in the description - current or planned...) But it looks like it's an overall improvment on...  [Read More]
Posted in: OJP (Open Jedi Project)
 RenegadeOfPhunk
09-28-2003, 2:32 PM
#105
Multiple checkouts (in Visual SourceSafe) are 'similar' to an unlocked repository, except you still have the concept of checking out. Checking out a file doesn't stop other people checking out that same file, but it means: a. When you check out, yo...  [Read More]
Posted in: OJP (Open Jedi Project)
 RenegadeOfPhunk
09-28-2003, 12:16 PM
#103
Wudan, I totally agree - external files... ...WHERE possible! But many alterations can't be nice and neatly bundled up in seperate files. I certainly see very little of the changes meant for Distribution 1 being able to be kept to seperate files....  [Read More]
Posted in: OJP (Open Jedi Project)
 RenegadeOfPhunk
09-28-2003, 12:09 PM
#101
Also consider this: With a locked checkout system, individual users don't nessesarily HAVE to wait till that file is checked back in... You could just go ahead and adjust that file locally anyway - even if it is checked out. Just make sure you mark...  [Read More]
Posted in: OJP (Open Jedi Project)
 RenegadeOfPhunk
09-28-2003, 11:56 AM
#100
If we do these tests, and we find that it's fairly easy to start writing over other people's changes accidently, I think we may have to consider restricting it to (single) checkout's. ...either that, or discover a new, better - but still free and on...  [Read More]
Posted in: OJP (Open Jedi Project)
 RenegadeOfPhunk
09-28-2003, 11:03 AM
#99
I would CERTAINLY hope it does! Or we could end up in SERIOUS s**t! To me, it seems like going about things backwards anyway. Surely it would be easier to make the user at least mark when they start working on a file. (And at the point of marking,...  [Read More]
Posted in: OJP (Open Jedi Project)
 RenegadeOfPhunk
09-28-2003, 10:43 AM
#97
Hmm... Well, looks like the term 'multiple-checkouts' is a MicroShaft specific term. (I mainly use Visual SourceSafe) In CVS, the equivalent is basically an unlocked system which merges in changes the best it can. ...but since people don't have to...  [Read More]
Posted in: OJP (Open Jedi Project)
 RenegadeOfPhunk
09-28-2003, 9:14 AM
#95
About check in's and out's I think whatever CVS we end up using should have some kind of check-in / check-out system. (If it doesn't have that, it won't be a very good one...!) That doesn't mean only one person can modify a file at a time. If the C...  [Read More]
Posted in: OJP (Open Jedi Project)
 RenegadeOfPhunk
09-27-2003, 10:04 PM
#87
The possibility of co-op is indeed very sexy! ;) And yes - I think we need to get as much of the modding community on board as possible. At the end of the day, the more this is standard across the board, the more it benefits everybody....  [Read More]
Posted in: OJP (Open Jedi Project)
 RenegadeOfPhunk
09-27-2003, 9:42 PM
#85
Sounds great Emon. That covers it all. Now if we are agreed on the purpose of OJP, we can move on to practicalities. btw - I have applied to ChrisC3P0 for seperate forums and webspace for the OJP project. He did say it sounded like a good idea, but...  [Read More]
Page: 13 of 21