Note: LucasForums Archive Project
The content here was reconstructed by scraping the Wayback Machine in an effort to restore some of what was lost when LF went down. The LucasForums Archive Project claims no ownership over the content or assets that were archived on archive.org.

This project is meant for research purposes only.
 

RenegadeOfPhunk

Latest Posts

Page: 1 of 21
Posted in: Which mod to use - specifics?
  RenegadeOfPhunk
04-22-2005, 5:12 AM
#9
so let me excuse me for what i said.... No worries Slider :) I've seen the latest preview video of JA+, and gotta say, looks like you've got some nice new stuff in there. Congrats. And I like the new direction your trying to take with the mod as a...  [Read More]
Posted in: Suggestions for slider for JA+ 2.3
  RenegadeOfPhunk
03-14-2005, 5:13 PM
#48
Hey Razor :) ...I dont' post much these days, but I still lurk sometimes ;) Just popped in to answer Hotrod's 'concerns'. I don't think I have much to contribute to the main topic here, it's all been said before. ...I'd listen to Amidala and co on...  [Read More]
Posted in: Suggestions for slider for JA+ 2.3
  RenegadeOfPhunk
03-14-2005, 12:01 PM
#45
Yes, I know they are attacking in these shots but it's the only ones I have offhand that shows how I mostly attack. Even if the are standing there trying to block, I'll go at the side and hit somewhere they arn't blocking. Timing timing and more tim...  [Read More]
Posted in: Suggestions for slider for JA+ 2.3
  RenegadeOfPhunk
03-14-2005, 4:33 AM
#43
Movie Battles I didn't like because of the weird blocking system. As long as you have block points and hold down the block key, you can block incoming attacks....even if the incoming attacks is nowhere near your saber. Tested it a lot. I'd have someo...  [Read More]
Posted in: Homosexuality: a tool of war
  RenegadeOfPhunk
11-08-2004, 3:51 PM
#57
...it was obvious that I was fighting against YOUR indoctrination, the indoctrination OF YOU. Ermm, no - not obvious, as I made clear in my previous post. Check another of your statements regarding my opinion... you may or may not have been indoc...  [Read More]
Posted in: Homosexuality: a tool of war
  RenegadeOfPhunk
11-08-2004, 2:46 PM
#55
Who said anything about you MAKING anyone do anything? Sheesh. You did. In this very thread. Guess I'll have to remind you of your own words (again): You said: but I'll also fight against trendy-lefty indoctrination that makes people ignore the...  [Read More]
Posted in: Homosexuality: a tool of war
  RenegadeOfPhunk
11-08-2004, 8:40 AM
#52
Actually, I prefer that concept of God to the grampa bearded softy everyone here seems to know so much about. Well, takes all kinds of course. Can't say I agree with your taste in deity's... ..but at least we both acknowledge what Biblical God is a...  [Read More]
Posted in: Homosexuality: a tool of war
  RenegadeOfPhunk
11-08-2004, 1:09 AM
#49
but I'll also fight against trendy-lefty indoctrination that makes people ignore the GOOD things in Christianity and other religions, and label them incorrectly. And once again I will make it very clear that the Bible contains many good principles...  [Read More]
Posted in: Homosexuality: a tool of war
  RenegadeOfPhunk
11-07-2004, 2:53 AM
#13
In another thread, I stated that the Bible contains several inhuman, barbaric concepts which does lead to immoral attitudes in Christian believers... homosexuality is totally unnatural, and prolly what pissed God off enough to wipe out Sodom and Ga...  [Read More]
Posted in: The agnostic's cry for understanding.
  RenegadeOfPhunk
11-03-2004, 6:40 AM
#64
People say that God is a impartial being, and he is also all-merciful. Now, I'm going to go a bit technical here. Yeah, I very much agree that 'all-merciful' is a bit of a misnomer, especially considering the behaviours of many of the deity's this...  [Read More]
Posted in: The agnostic's cry for understanding.
  RenegadeOfPhunk
11-03-2004, 5:25 AM
#62
Now wait wait, Renegade! I never, ever, said that there was sufficient evidence for the Theist side. I was simply trying to express how I felt to toms about agnosticism and doubt. Ahh, ok. Fair enough :) How about a God who punishes people for th...  [Read More]
Posted in: The agnostic's cry for understanding.
  RenegadeOfPhunk
11-03-2004, 5:13 AM
#60
judge is doubtful, because he does not know which side to believe, as both have equally good evidence. His mind is under siege over the matter. Now this I disagree with. I dont' beleive the Theist side of this argument have much good evidence at a...  [Read More]
Posted in: The agnostic's cry for understanding.
  RenegadeOfPhunk
11-03-2004, 4:28 AM
#58
That isn't doubt. And (unless i suddenly get some evidence) it isn't fleeting either. The term 'doubt' totally depends on your point of view. From the agnostic point of view, there is no 'doubt' that you are sure you have no opinion either way. (A...  [Read More]
Posted in: The agnostic's cry for understanding.
  RenegadeOfPhunk
11-02-2004, 5:31 AM
#47
Let us say that the evidence is perfectly balanced, meaning that there can be no judgement against each other, yet. Thus you are doubtful, and do not know which team to believe, because there is no evidence to prove the right (and wrong) of the teams...  [Read More]
Posted in: The Validity of Science
  RenegadeOfPhunk
10-27-2004, 4:51 AM
#33
OK Skin, accepted. Well, let's get back to the real issue here, and let me clearly demonstrate where your argument is going wrong Spider. Hree are a couple of examples of where your argument is coming from... Statement A: What I've been criticisi...  [Read More]
Posted in: The Validity of Science
  RenegadeOfPhunk
10-25-2004, 11:19 AM
#29
And I note you have no examples of "evil" in the bible to show us... Well, I'm frankly surprised I even have to point out stuff this obvious to you, but all you have to do is ask, and ye shall recieve... The lives of heathens and anybod...  [Read More]
Posted in: The Validity of Science
  RenegadeOfPhunk
10-24-2004, 2:46 AM
#24
Rubbish, the bible's philosophy (bearing in mind that there are different versions of the bible, and different testaments therein) is a good philosophy. If christianity lived up to its principles, it would be a better institution. Likewise, if scient...  [Read More]
Posted in: The Validity of Science
  RenegadeOfPhunk
10-23-2004, 4:13 PM
#22
Actually it's "hate the sin, not the sinner", so there shouldn't be any malice involved. Again, you seem to read my words and then create your own :rolleyes: Read back and comprehend I didn't use the word 'hate' :rolleyes: ..you think ha...  [Read More]
Posted in: The Validity of Science
  RenegadeOfPhunk
10-23-2004, 3:53 PM
#20
I think we both agree upon the definition of "the philosophies of science". What we do NOT agree on is whether you should keep going on about them. Ehem, the fact is this definition has everything to do with it, because it's obvious you'v...  [Read More]
Posted in: The Validity of Science
  RenegadeOfPhunk
10-23-2004, 3:05 PM
#18
Look - let me get this straight. When I say 'philosophies' of Science, I'm talking about the philosophies discussed by people like Francis Bacon and Karl Popper. (THe philosophy of how [and if you indeed can] determine what is true, and what isn't)...  [Read More]
Posted in: The Validity of Science
  RenegadeOfPhunk
10-23-2004, 1:59 PM
#16
Like Christianity, many of the principles it's based on are entirely laudable, but I refuse to ignore the deep flaws in the actual organisation and its history just because it's got some good groundrules that it doesn't actually live by I've alread...  [Read More]
Posted in: The Validity of Science
  RenegadeOfPhunk
10-23-2004, 1:20 PM
#14
Your not really concceding my point Spider. Your judging the core philosophy by the eventual outcome alone. And since we already know the eventual outcome is always going to be imperfect because all humans are imperfect, your always going to see the...  [Read More]
Posted in: The Validity of Science
  RenegadeOfPhunk
10-23-2004, 1:03 PM
#12
Well, I think it's important here to distinguish between the 'pure' philosophy of science, and how science ends up working on the real world. ...two different things entirely. In the 'ideal' world of scientific thought, it would not be affected by p...  [Read More]
Posted in: Centripidal and centrifugal forces
  RenegadeOfPhunk
10-23-2004, 7:43 AM
#64
Well, this is the most important point you've made to this particular 'argument': The non-inertial approach to analysing the situation is perfectly equivalent to the inertial. Anyway, this should be an outline of the use of the words centripetal fo...  [Read More]
Posted in: Centripidal and centrifugal forces
  RenegadeOfPhunk
10-23-2004, 1:12 AM
#62
is that i do not consider the sun to be in circular motion. Well, let's be clear - the Sun is not in a circular motion because it has 9-odd planets, a few of them big f**kers - yanking it all over the place in different directions. ...it doesn't so...  [Read More]
Page: 1 of 21