Note: LucasForums Archive Project
The content here was reconstructed by scraping the Wayback Machine in an effort to restore some of what was lost when LF went down. The LucasForums Archive Project claims no ownership over the content or assets that were archived on archive.org.

This project is meant for research purposes only.
 

StealthWar42

Latest Posts

Page: 1 of 2
Posted in: Twilight Imperium (Gauging interest... WARNING: extensive background information)
  StealthWar42
01-22-2006, 6:36 PM
#6
I'm going to bump this one last time. If i get no other comments, i'll leave it alone. :)...  [Read More]
Posted in: Twilight Imperium (Gauging interest... WARNING: extensive background information)
  StealthWar42
01-20-2006, 1:38 PM
#5
Can somebody delete this? Waste of space at this point...  [Read More]
Posted in: Twilight Imperium (Gauging interest... WARNING: extensive background information)
  StealthWar42
01-16-2006, 10:20 PM
#4
No other opinions? :( I've only had two opinions so far: one good and one bad! But I'm getting started on modelling right now... and my friend is working on skinning and concept art. It would be nice to get a couple more opinions to see if I should...  [Read More]
Posted in: Twilight Imperium (Gauging interest... WARNING: extensive background information)
  StealthWar42
01-15-2006, 1:56 PM
#3
Yeah, that's a concern of mine as well. I think that a diplomacy system might be impossible to add in the game. But, even without diplomacy, I think this would work. There was a diplomacy system in R:TW and that barely did anything, and there were tw...  [Read More]
Posted in: Twilight Imperium (Gauging interest... WARNING: extensive background information)
  StealthWar42
01-14-2006, 7:29 PM
#1
*WARNING* very long, but it can be a good read for those who like backstories to games. This took a long time to type up so I'd appreciate it if you would at least "glance" over it and tell me if it sounds interesting enough or not to make...  [Read More]
Posted in: The Beauty of Episode III
  StealthWar42
12-03-2005, 4:14 PM
#5
I liked how when Obi-wan was looking at the security holo thing that anakin was physically choking a little kid... while simultaneously fighting another little kid in a lightsaber duel....  [Read More]
Posted in: How long will You wait before you play Online.
  StealthWar42
11-27-2005, 1:57 PM
#6
Yeah, same as everyone else who posted before me. By the way, Firefly rocks! :D...  [Read More]
Posted in: EaW release day. what will you do?
  StealthWar42
11-26-2005, 12:48 PM
#19
Popcorn, I couldn't have said it any better myself. I love that build-up of hype!...  [Read More]
Posted in: The Best sci-fi That Had Been Canceled
  StealthWar42
12-11-2005, 4:08 PM
#16
Firefly... perfect balance of technology AND human skill, as opposed to relying on too much of one or the other. Great story, and awesome characters....  [Read More]
Posted in: Does the timeline go far enough?
  StealthWar42
11-21-2005, 5:58 PM
#44
Yeah sorry... i won't use caps anymore. Sorry Darth and popcorn!...  [Read More]
Posted in: Does the timeline go far enough?
  StealthWar42
11-21-2005, 5:53 PM
#42
Well, he was just saying "that doesn't make any sense to include both" and he wasn't even giving a reason. I didn't feel as if I was overly aggressive either, it's not like I was just shouting obscenities... any capitalized words were there...  [Read More]
Posted in: Does the timeline go far enough?
  StealthWar42
11-21-2005, 5:16 PM
#39
Why WOULDN'T it make sense if the timeline went further? Technology improves over time, the same rule applies to the death star. The first design of the death star only had a superlaser that could fire once a day. The second design had a superlaser t...  [Read More]
Posted in: Does the timeline go far enough?
  StealthWar42
11-21-2005, 12:43 AM
#36
Once again, you're missing the point... but whatever....  [Read More]
Posted in: Does the timeline go far enough?
  StealthWar42
11-20-2005, 6:17 PM
#33
Guys, guys, you're missing the point of the thread: this is pretty much like a debate if whether or not the timeline goes far enough. If this were titled "Discuss how far the timeline goes" your argument would be valid, but it's not, it's c...  [Read More]
Posted in: Does the timeline go far enough?
  StealthWar42
11-18-2005, 7:34 PM
#26
Darth Moeller - there have been a few posts already about WHY the second death star should be in the game. The fact is that the first deathstar had a superlaser that could only fire once a day, it needed time to cool down. The second death star had...  [Read More]
Posted in: Does the timeline go far enough?
  StealthWar42
11-16-2005, 12:10 AM
#15
Deathstar two apparently has a different superlaser, one that takes less recharge time therefore allowing the capability for destroying capital ships....  [Read More]
Posted in: Does the timeline go far enough?
  StealthWar42
11-14-2005, 5:10 PM
#8
As long as they make an expansion that goes to RotJ, stopping just at the second death star battle, I'm good with it. Otherwise, if there are no plans for an expansion, i'm slightly disappointed that some of my favorite ships won't be in there (and n...  [Read More]
Posted in: The immortality of heroes??
  StealthWar42
11-08-2005, 7:17 PM
#48
How do you know that already?...  [Read More]
Posted in: The immortality of heroes??
  StealthWar42
11-07-2005, 9:17 PM
#30
Agreed, Naja and BattleDamage. Heroism has no place on the battlefield! ;) (just kidding not looking to get flamed)...  [Read More]
Posted in: The immortality of heroes??
  StealthWar42
11-07-2005, 5:44 PM
#25
I know you must be careful with them, but I think a big enough consequence for a hero dying is waiting for them to re-spawn wherever you get your heroes. I know in Warcraft III if you lost a hero in a large battle that turned the tide tremendously, a...  [Read More]
Posted in: Confirmed: Death Star CAN destroy Capitol Ships
  StealthWar42
09-21-2005, 8:37 AM
#16
Yeah, he did say something along those lines, but no absolutes about whether or not the Death Star can destroy capitop ships. You know, an easy solution would be just to ask them in that chat... then we'll have a real answer....  [Read More]
Posted in: Confirmed: Death Star CAN destroy Capitol Ships
  StealthWar42
09-21-2005, 12:20 AM
#14
Hmm, I feel like I'm lacking in examples. Let's take AoE vs EaW. AoE has resource gathering, a hinderance in some people's eyes, content to other people. Whatever. So in EaW you can't do this, it's not as complex... but you still get an income and y...  [Read More]
Posted in: Confirmed: Death Star CAN destroy Capitol Ships
  StealthWar42
09-21-2005, 12:13 AM
#13
Well, I'm sure balance and depth will still be there... just not on the level of previous RTS's. RoN, AoE... they all had balance and depth at a different level, including various improvements to resource gathering AND battle techniques. It sounds li...  [Read More]
Posted in: Confirmed: Death Star CAN destroy Capitol Ships
  StealthWar42
09-20-2005, 10:22 PM
#11
Well, he also said that you could vary how much of the battles you want to actually control. So, theoretically, it would appeal to both sides: the casual gamer who wants a quick 15-minute cinematic battle, and the hardcore gamer who wants to win with...  [Read More]
Posted in: Confirmed: Death Star CAN destroy Capitol Ships
  StealthWar42
09-20-2005, 7:59 PM
#8
bah, popcorn you just said exactly what I came here to post. listen to the lines again guys... it doesn't mean the death star can't, but it's definitely not a confirmation yet....  [Read More]
Page: 1 of 2