Note: LucasForums Archive Project
The content here was reconstructed by scraping the Wayback Machine in an effort to restore some of what was lost when LF went down. The LucasForums Archive Project claims no ownership over the content or assets that were archived on archive.org.

This project is meant for research purposes only.
 

Master_Keralys

Latest Posts

Page: 12 of 12
Posted in: The History of the Universe
 Master_Keralys
01-22-2003, 4:33 PM
#51
Exactly Reborn. Nicely stated....  [Read More]
Posted in: The History of the Universe
 Master_Keralys
01-22-2003, 4:31 PM
#50
Cjais - that's philosophy now for one thing. For another, if that's the case, then you're the same nothing, and I am everything. "If a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to hear it, does it still fall?" If you're all that exists...  [Read More]
Posted in: The History of the Universe
 Master_Keralys
01-17-2003, 6:41 PM
#24
Theory: an unproved assumption: CONJECTURE (source: Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary) A theory can not be proven. Anything that has been conclusively proven is considered a law. Cjais, no argument you've given has been any more convincing tha...  [Read More]
Posted in: The History of the Universe
 Master_Keralys
01-14-2003, 7:33 PM
#15
Consider dogs. Take the Chihuahua and the Grand Danois (big Dane ). One is the size of a rat, the other the size of a small horse. They're both dogs. Now, we're going to run some serious selective breeding on these two dog species. We pick the smalle...  [Read More]
Posted in: The History of the Universe
 Master_Keralys
01-14-2003, 10:53 AM
#12
While you are correct in pointing at that one cannot prove or disprove the existence of God, there is proof of a creator. There is a principle known as irreducible complexity. This means that all the parts in that system must be present for it to wor...  [Read More]
Posted in: The History of the Universe
 Master_Keralys
01-13-2003, 3:59 PM
#1
Scientists keep debating the origin of the universe. They keep telling us that life and the planets and everything else are just byproducts of mere chance. On the other hand, there are those who tell us that the universe was designed, and it doesn't...  [Read More]
Posted in: Cold War II?
 Master_Keralys
01-13-2003, 4:26 PM
#5
Originally posted by Cjais If USA makes themselves any more unpopular down there, they might have to start deporting the citizens by force. It's looking grim. The US hasn't necessarily made itself unpopular. We're unpopular over there because we'r...  [Read More]
Posted in: Abortion
 Master_Keralys
01-23-2003, 5:15 PM
#127
Okay, here's the whole thing - where do you draw the line for humanity? When does one become human? If it's when you're no longer dependent on anyone, then I'm not human. My parents still provide my food, clothing, etc. I could survive on my own much...  [Read More]
Posted in: for or against human cloning?
 Master_Keralys
01-22-2003, 4:21 PM
#158
Are the lives of a few unwanted fetuses worth more than the trillians of lives that could be saved thru cloneable organs in the future? Number one, its a lot more than a few lives. It's millions. Next, it depends on what your perspective is. If you...  [Read More]
Posted in: for or against human cloning?
 Master_Keralys
01-17-2003, 6:07 PM
#153
Cloning the whole body is much easier since you don't have to know how to make the cloned cells be a certain body part OR figure out a way to make the cloned part grow into a whole organ OR keep it alive outside the body. :confused: Actually, that's...  [Read More]
Posted in: for or against human cloning?
 Master_Keralys
01-17-2003, 3:42 PM
#151
Originally posted by razorace ...You first have to be able to clone a whole person before you can expect to be able to clone individual parts for medical purposes. As for failed attempts, they're more likely to simply result in a miscarriage or non-...  [Read More]
Posted in: for or against human cloning?
 Master_Keralys
01-14-2003, 7:38 PM
#147
No. But your finger isn't going to turn into an unmistakably human group of cells within the next three weeks, either....  [Read More]
Posted in: for or against human cloning?
 Master_Keralys
01-14-2003, 10:57 AM
#144
It's not voluntary for the fetus....  [Read More]
Posted in: for or against human cloning?
 Master_Keralys
01-13-2003, 3:50 PM
#140
The thing is, it is more convenient to destroy fetuses to harvest the stem cells. And more difficult and painful to get them from anywhere in an adult (the spine is a strong source of stem cells, too). But which do you think most people would prefer,...  [Read More]
Posted in: for or against human cloning?
 Master_Keralys
01-11-2003, 7:26 PM
#134
Most of you are missing one critical point throughout this topic. The truth is, we don't NEED cloning! It is quite possible to take stem cells - yes the exact kind needed - from a fully grown human adult. There is no requirement for cloning. (Also, s...  [Read More]
Page: 12 of 12