Note: LucasForums Archive Project
The content here was reconstructed by scraping the Wayback Machine in an effort to restore some of what was lost when LF went down. The LucasForums Archive Project claims no ownership over the content or assets that were archived on archive.org.

This project is meant for research purposes only.
 

Jan Gaarni

Latest Posts

Page: 35 of 70
Posted in: Empire like the United States?
  Jan Gaarni
08-15-2003, 2:21 PM
#13
And it's not like the Emperor threatened to kill a whole planet for information either. That was all Tarkins decission. :) But then again, he didn't dissaprove of it much either, I'm sure. :D...  [Read More]
Posted in: Empire like the United States?
  Jan Gaarni
08-14-2003, 1:36 PM
#5
they are both powerful but not the same, the empire just destroys planets to make somebody give up info, the us just uses its power when it sees fit How is that different? :) In the first part of your comment you basically say that the Empire uses...  [Read More]
Posted in: The new Fixes due to release this week
  Jan Gaarni
08-12-2003, 11:42 PM
#4
56,000 Cr for a medium house isn't all that bad. I've seen worse. Though you can get one for around 44,500 from Corzip (starsider). :)...  [Read More]
Posted in: The new Fixes due to release this week
  Jan Gaarni
08-12-2003, 8:20 PM
#2
I agree fully on both accounts. That's pretty much all I have to say right now. :) Granted, there's some pretty insane prices developing for some of these things. I mean, come on, a large house for 150,000 Cr?!? They can produce the house for 10 t...  [Read More]
Posted in: StarWars Questions
  Jan Gaarni
08-08-2003, 8:10 PM
#9
Is this a Senate Chambers type thread? In 4, 5, and 6? No, don't think they are. In episode 2? Err.. yes. In Force Commander you can tell they ain't, but then again FC isn't canon. Don't wisk it awayso fast. :) Remeber those 2 brothers? Whom one...  [Read More]
Posted in: Why is tatooine the center of the starwars universe?
  Jan Gaarni
08-21-2003, 9:36 AM
#34
THERE WAS NO PERCEPTION OF SCALE! Errr, could you be alittle more spesific than that? :confused:...  [Read More]
Posted in: Why is tatooine the center of the starwars universe?
  Jan Gaarni
08-17-2003, 5:31 AM
#29
What was wrong with Dagobah?!? :confused:...  [Read More]
Posted in: Rebel PA
  Jan Gaarni
07-29-2003, 8:59 PM
#2
Try to keep threads in the right forums, ok?...  [Read More]
Posted in: Battle of Yavin - Tractor Beam not used?
  Jan Gaarni
07-26-2003, 8:06 AM
#9
The tractor beams are not used because they were not out to capture them, but to destroy them. And how do you destroy a fighter? You shoot it down. :) And the tractor beams does not work too well so close to the station once they were on the surf...  [Read More]
Posted in: Please Read This Thread
  Jan Gaarni
07-26-2003, 10:40 AM
#6
Consider this, Just Darth: The game is 10 times the size of EverQuest (all of Norath atleast) ... in it's current state! Yet it costs nomore than EQ when it first launched in it's time. Once the Space Expansion comes out, it will be atleast 10 times...  [Read More]
Posted in: battle hack?!?
  Jan Gaarni
08-05-2003, 3:02 PM
#3
First of all, this fits better in this forum. :) Secondly, the SWG Forums are part of a large network of forums involving many LucasArts (http://www.lucasarts.com) games, called the LucasForums (http://www.lucasforums.com), which is the Main Site....  [Read More]
Posted in: Why wasn't the Death Star a rebel weapon?
  Jan Gaarni
08-21-2003, 8:21 AM
#45
Ok, reason why I didn't list that canon source more detailed is because I've already did so plenty of times in this very thread. :) But I'll list it again, alittle more detailed. From the highest ranking to the lowest ranking: Movies Script of the...  [Read More]
Posted in: Why wasn't the Death Star a rebel weapon?
  Jan Gaarni
08-20-2003, 7:59 AM
#42
*sigh* Well, this is all fine and dandy, and a very good dividing up the EU by the way :) , but this is your defination of what canon is: A fan's definition. I however, go by a much higher organisations policy of what is canon and what is not canon,...  [Read More]
Posted in: Why wasn't the Death Star a rebel weapon?
  Jan Gaarni
08-13-2003, 8:28 AM
#40
In the end, I believe it was JediNyt who gave the most satisfactory answer: the Republic has existed a thousand years, and the Jedi, like facilities of higher education in our own world, count a generation as a graduating class, i.e., Padawan graduat...  [Read More]
Posted in: Why wasn't the Death Star a rebel weapon?
  Jan Gaarni
08-11-2003, 5:56 AM
#37
Tossing in again... the stuff under "The Movies" banner is not all canon because it uses things from the novelizations, which, while closer to canon than your average EU book or comic, because they're based off of Lucas' movies, are still E...  [Read More]
Posted in: Why wasn't the Death Star a rebel weapon?
  Jan Gaarni
08-08-2003, 7:56 PM
#33
Wel, technically, it was about why the Rebels didn't have the Death Star. :) And the answer is very simple: Because the Empire had the plans for it. :D Let's just leave it at that, shall we? ;)...  [Read More]
Posted in: Why wasn't the Death Star a rebel weapon?
  Jan Gaarni
08-07-2003, 7:51 PM
#31
Like I already said this isn't about some vehicles stats, but the main plot and everything. to say that the rebellion was created by bel iblis, organa and mon mothma is kind of erroneous(sp?). Such things are considered EU since it's not stated nowhe...  [Read More]
Posted in: Why wasn't the Death Star a rebel weapon?
  Jan Gaarni
08-06-2003, 9:33 PM
#29
Star Wars Databank states that the Executor is 12,800 meters long. Other EU sources claim it to be 8,000 meters long (ROFL :D ) The movies show that it is alittle longer than 17km long. Very few EU sources support this, but they do excist. They eith...  [Read More]
Posted in: Why wasn't the Death Star a rebel weapon?
  Jan Gaarni
08-06-2003, 7:44 PM
#27
Databank is just official, it is not canon. It is EU, as it expands on the Star Wars knowledge. :) That's what EU is. :)...  [Read More]
Posted in: Why wasn't the Death Star a rebel weapon?
  Jan Gaarni
08-06-2003, 7:31 PM
#25
Well, if you look at it that way, then the Imperial Star Destroyers in the movies can't be 1,600 meters long. :) Scratch that, that was weak. :D You can actually calculate to around that size from the movies, even though it has never been mentioned...  [Read More]
Posted in: Why wasn't the Death Star a rebel weapon?
  Jan Gaarni
08-06-2003, 4:27 AM
#23
1-That's what I said I doN,t see why you... I missunderstood then. :) I apologies. I'll shut up now. It seems bad things come out of my mouth when I open it lately. :D And for the record, I'm a Star Wars Fan. That means I love all that is Offici...  [Read More]
Posted in: Why wasn't the Death Star a rebel weapon?
  Jan Gaarni
08-05-2003, 3:38 PM
#21
eu turned star wars into old pure sci-fi crap with the NJO serie. It is now a war between races, an old story told by so many sci-fi books. The true thing that made star wars unique in my eyes it was the fact that the battles were fought between huma...  [Read More]
Posted in: Why wasn't the Death Star a rebel weapon?
  Jan Gaarni
07-26-2003, 8:19 AM
#17
Originally posted by Jedi_Monk Repost: As for any relationship between the Separatist Movement and the Rebel Alliance--I don't believe it exists. The motivation behind the Alliance is to reinstate the Democratic Republic, whereas the Separatists are...  [Read More]
Posted in: E.T. Technique Used In ESB & ROTJ?
  Jan Gaarni
07-26-2003, 8:26 AM
#14
Oh, I don't know, he can change one more thing in my view. :) The fact that every officer in RotJ is either a Captain or Commander according to the rank insignias they are wearing is just ridiculous. :D And yes, must not forget the blunder about...  [Read More]
Posted in: E.T. Technique Used In ESB & ROTJ?
  Jan Gaarni
07-26-2003, 7:53 AM
#12
Yes. The bad movies are the new ones, in both story telling and effects. Why? Too much CGI, and not enough models, or real locations so that the actors had something real to relate to. Why was Star Wars a hit in the first place? Because it had a...  [Read More]
Page: 35 of 70