Note: LucasForums Archive Project
The content here was reconstructed by scraping the Wayback Machine in an effort to restore some of what was lost when LF went down. The LucasForums Archive Project claims no ownership over the content or assets that were archived on archive.org.

This project is meant for research purposes only.
 

iamtrip

Latest Posts

Page: 1 of 6
Posted in: Problem with main screen
  iamtrip
10-16-2004, 5:23 PM
#3
Its 99% likely to be your graphics card....  [Read More]
Posted in: screen shot (step by step explanations...)
  iamtrip
10-15-2004, 12:42 PM
#24
That was a bit naughty Samus's big bro!...  [Read More]
Posted in: screen shot (step by step explanations...)
  iamtrip
10-14-2004, 2:55 PM
#19
Originally posted by samus's big bro this is the big thing file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/eddie/My%20Documents/My%20Pictures/shot0000.jpg lololol...  [Read More]
Posted in: FDA OK'S implanted medical info chip
  iamtrip
10-18-2004, 10:14 AM
#30
Personal freedom is a fallacy. Going off the technological information available to us at this moment, everything we ever do is likely to be monitored. I think the proof is in 'Demzilla' and the other (forgot its name) program, which collects (public...  [Read More]
Posted in: FDA OK'S implanted medical info chip
  iamtrip
10-16-2004, 3:08 AM
#24
Your cellphone can traced to give your position via GPS. Your phonelines can be monitered via digital system. Your email can be intercepted and read without you knowing. CCTV cameras moniter towns and cities 24 hours a day (some with powerful face re...  [Read More]
Posted in: Ethics of Fox Hunting and Pest Control
  iamtrip
10-25-2004, 12:01 PM
#56
I know that if your head is severed, your body "kills itself" Really? Tried it lately? Or maybe ...you've asked people pre/post head separation. Let me just rephrase this. You're suggesting that if you chop of someone's head, their body s...  [Read More]
Posted in: Ethics of Fox Hunting and Pest Control
  iamtrip
10-19-2004, 10:53 AM
#46
Well as you said, if both methods (torture and poison) were to be equally painful and prolonged, as is the case with fox hunting, it really doesn't matter which way the fox dies. Take this from the perspective of the fox: Your internal organs expan...  [Read More]
Posted in: Ethics of Fox Hunting and Pest Control
  iamtrip
10-19-2004, 7:59 AM
#44
I'm growing tired of repeating perfectly clear views. I have already directly addressed all of your points, yet you continually ask for them to be rephrased simply, for your benefit. Please re-read. If something is logically determined to be immora...  [Read More]
Posted in: Ethics of Fox Hunting and Pest Control
  iamtrip
10-18-2004, 10:05 AM
#41
1: You still haven't explained why you think that because ONE immoral thing goes on, that makes ANOTHER immoral thing acceptable. We should ban both immoral things, yes, but banning one is a good first step. We could ban the torture of frogs, and tha...  [Read More]
Posted in: Ethics of Fox Hunting and Pest Control
  iamtrip
10-18-2004, 7:01 AM
#37
Supposing a humane and perfectly safe method of killing foxes (which threatened the livelihood of farmers) was devised. (When I say humane, I mean kills them instantly, or painlessly). ...would you then unequivocally argue for a ban on fox hunting an...  [Read More]
Posted in: Ethics of Fox Hunting and Pest Control
  iamtrip
10-17-2004, 8:32 AM
#34
Well dealing with the poisons first. If you were to introduce powerful poisons into the ecosystem, what would be the resultant effect? You need a poison which is well placed so its distribution among creatures other than foxes is minimal. Additionall...  [Read More]
Posted in: Ethics of Fox Hunting and Pest Control
  iamtrip
10-16-2004, 1:35 PM
#31
I have explained my beliefs regarding the morality of fox hunting. I believe the killing of pests, for whatever reason, is acceptable. Since the likelihood is the same animals will die via a different, although equally horrific means, I do not have a...  [Read More]
Posted in: Ethics of Fox Hunting and Pest Control
  iamtrip
10-15-2004, 5:12 PM
#29
I just find it amusing that people may see the ban as some kind of idealic legislation by a sympathetic government now dedicated to animal welfare and human rights, which from reading other posts is the impression that is created. People refers to s...  [Read More]
Posted in: Ethics of Fox Hunting and Pest Control
  iamtrip
10-15-2004, 1:08 PM
#27
Battery Farming etc. is relevant is displaying government policy hasn't banned fox hunting due to issues of morality, despite what it may claim. If the ban was due to moral reasons, then the government could have tackled other, more widespread issue...  [Read More]
Posted in: Ethics of Fox Hunting and Pest Control
  iamtrip
10-14-2004, 3:12 PM
#25
Debating the issue has become irrelevant as neither of our opinions will be changed. All the arguments of any substance in favour of a ban have been stated. As have the arguments against a ban. You argue how its immoral, I argue other, worse areas ar...  [Read More]
Posted in: Ethics of Fox Hunting and Pest Control
  iamtrip
10-14-2004, 7:50 AM
#23
And I'll take those statements as an admission of defeat from you on the issue of the morality behind the fox hunting ban. Do as you wish. I could continue to posts reasons why fox hunting shouldn't be banned, but it's as equally pointless as you c...  [Read More]
Posted in: Ethics of Fox Hunting and Pest Control
  iamtrip
10-13-2004, 3:34 PM
#20
Debating the morals of fox hunting is pointless. Your opinion won't change and neither will mine. However, you need to ask yourselves the real reason why fox hunting was banned. When did battery farming last make the front pages? When was the last...  [Read More]
Posted in: Ethics of Fox Hunting and Pest Control
  iamtrip
10-13-2004, 7:45 AM
#16
Firstly, you know as well as I do that battery farming is a long, long way from being banned. Yet tertiary issues such as fox hunting are brought to the headlines. Whilstmy morals aren't effected by the press, the majority of other people's are. Why?...  [Read More]
Posted in: Is it worth it to buy JA, if I already own JO? (NOT JK2 vs JA, no flames please)
  iamtrip
10-14-2004, 7:38 AM
#16
Originally posted by txa1265 Yes - and I'm sure that they are MP players, right? You might get that impression from many people here as well, but don't let that fool you ... Remember what our president said - fool me once ... shame on .... um ......  [Read More]
Posted in: Is it worth it to buy JA, if I already own JO? (NOT JK2 vs JA, no flames please)
  iamtrip
10-13-2004, 2:58 PM
#10
Originally posted by Gerardo I'm a veteran Jedi Outcast player, I own Jedi Outcast, and I'm just wondering is it worth it to buy JA, or should i just stick with what i got. ALso, tell me about the Sarlacc Pit. I saw a screenshot of it but is it real...  [Read More]
Posted in: The real Threat to American safety?
  iamtrip
10-14-2004, 3:30 PM
#56
Ok, so you again reiterate your argument that parties are self serving. Now back to one of many examples I have given where this is not the case. If you're referring to Lloyd George and his pensions on the other hand, it was a change of chancellor,...  [Read More]
Posted in: The real Threat to American safety?
  iamtrip
10-14-2004, 8:12 AM
#54
Your suggestions did summon the image of a toddler jumping up and down and throwing his teddy out of the cot. How is this personal to you? You've already stated that your argument for the reasons why people may abstain does not reflect the fact that...  [Read More]
Posted in: The real Threat to American safety?
  iamtrip
10-13-2004, 3:21 PM
#52
At least this frees me to remark- on a personal level- that your attempts to debate are poor in the extreme IMHO. It would seem you began the personal insults. You were and still are losing terribly and resorted to a personal comment. and while not...  [Read More]
Posted in: The real Threat to American safety?
  iamtrip
10-13-2004, 7:25 AM
#49
I picked you up on your poor grammatical technique as it was critical to the explanation of your argument. Your poor phrasing made a nonsense of your ideas. My misspelling of 'partie' was hardly critical to the core of my argument. But feel free to c...  [Read More]
Posted in: The real Threat to American safety?
  iamtrip
10-12-2004, 11:12 AM
#47
Spider AL: Actually I think it's a mark not only of intelligence but of common horse-sense and moral fortitude to disagree strenuously with ONE ranting, biased pseud who, due to his lack of cogent arguments and debating skill, feels the need to sink...  [Read More]
Page: 1 of 6