Note: LucasForums Archive Project
The content here was reconstructed by scraping the Wayback Machine in an effort to restore some of what was lost when LF went down. The LucasForums Archive Project claims no ownership over the content or assets that were archived on archive.org.

This project is meant for research purposes only.
 

GarfieldJL

Latest Posts

Page: 2 of 33
Posted in: The Official Obama debate thread.
 GarfieldJL
01-31-2009, 3:06 PM
#109
I was under the impression that if a Bill passed the majority of people had voted for it? Or maybe that's me being naive. If you study the voting breakdown and the bill, you'd know that not even a single Republican voted for it, Obama is now trying...  [Read More]
Posted in: The Official Obama debate thread.
 GarfieldJL
01-30-2009, 5:57 PM
#103
There is no point to blame anymore, and that fact that you always seem to blame it one "them" is will get people nowhere. There is when they are the ones that lined their pockets from it and are in charge of Government Committees responsib...  [Read More]
Posted in: The Official Obama debate thread.
 GarfieldJL
01-30-2009, 5:03 PM
#101
Alright, then what about the ones right above the poverty line? The ones who are forced to live on minimum wage, and stuggle with a failing economy. They are still subjected to taxes, and I'm sure they can barely survive these days. The people that...  [Read More]
Posted in: The Official Obama debate thread.
 GarfieldJL
01-30-2009, 4:47 PM
#99
True, but even those in upper range saw a tax reduction, while those at poverty level got nothing. That is absolutely not fair. This is a tax cut, the people at poverty level DO NOT PAY TAXES! Then tax only the wealthy, the real ones who deserve...  [Read More]
Posted in: The Official Obama debate thread.
 GarfieldJL
01-30-2009, 4:28 PM
#97
Of course, hey; he's a liberal, they always corrupt everything. I was thinking more of a Chicago style Politician, cause there are a few liberals out there that I'm sure are not corrupt. ..and I'm sure that those tax cuts will be for the wealthy,...  [Read More]
Posted in: The Official Obama debate thread.
 GarfieldJL
01-30-2009, 12:03 PM
#93
You may ask why the crushing loss to the Dems then. Simple. McCain wasn't really our guy. Many Republicans were really turned off by him. Heck the common thought amongst McCain voters was "hold my nose and vote for McCain." Not really a str...  [Read More]
Posted in: The Official Obama debate thread.
 GarfieldJL
01-28-2009, 10:23 PM
#90
Come now, that's just rude. Doesn't change the fact that it's probably true. Remember this is the same Pelosi that preached for bipartisanism, and then locked the Republicans out of the House of Representives so they would have no say. I believe...  [Read More]
Posted in: The Official Obama debate thread.
 GarfieldJL
01-28-2009, 9:33 PM
#88
I saw that on BillO too, not Pelosi's finest moment. No, it's just a typical Pelosi moment. However, tell the whole story. That part of the stimulus package request was removed, at President Obama's request. I'm thinking that's not helping your &q...  [Read More]
Posted in: The Official Obama debate thread.
 GarfieldJL
01-28-2009, 9:14 PM
#84
That'd be the will of the people, so if you want to be angry, be angry at the good ol' US of A. And baw that your party is the loser right now. It's not always been that way, it's not going to be that way forever. That's the ebb and flow of politics,...  [Read More]
Posted in: The Official Obama debate thread.
 GarfieldJL
01-28-2009, 8:48 PM
#78
Recall that there are still 55 million GOP members in this country, and countless more independents. Let me put it this way, who controls the House and the Senate (the senate to the point all it takes is 1 vote and the Dems can ram through whateve...  [Read More]
Posted in: The Official Obama debate thread.
 GarfieldJL
01-28-2009, 11:01 AM
#73
Jae, some of Jedi_Man's comments indicates that he is actually better informed than I would expect from a person his age. That wasn't my point anyway. People need to remember that we have members with a huge range of ages on this forum, some of whom...  [Read More]
Posted in: The future of the Republican Party
 GarfieldJL
02-25-2009, 12:43 PM
#53
You said, "by your reasoning black people aren't as intelligent as White based on studies done years ago." Yes I did, by your line of reasoning those studies would be perfectly valid, I'm not saying you believe those studies, but your line...  [Read More]
Posted in: The future of the Republican Party
 GarfieldJL
02-24-2009, 9:39 PM
#50
Oh? You actually read the research article? Or you're just asserting that this information is inaccessible to prevent having to accept the validity? In fact, I believe the specific study in question about the IQ of atheists being statistically sign...  [Read More]
Posted in: The future of the Republican Party
 GarfieldJL
02-24-2009, 8:24 PM
#48
Mod Note:You'll need to quote the place I stated this, publicly retract this racist accusation, or receive an infraction. Being a fair person and a lenient moderator, I'll allow you the opportunity of 24 hours to PM me, edit your post, or retract you...  [Read More]
Posted in: The future of the Republican Party
 GarfieldJL
02-24-2009, 11:28 AM
#46
I'm dismissing your "sources" because they're irrelevant and show nothing. They're red herrings and have nothing to do with the topic at hand. If you truly believe the blog articles and news bits you've linked "show [my] sources to be...  [Read More]
Posted in: The future of the Republican Party
 GarfieldJL
02-24-2009, 12:18 AM
#44
Would I care to explain irrelevant links to irrelevant and frivolous lawsuits? Sure. The explanation is that the plaintiffs are possibly just crybabies. The fact that some whiny individuals are so full of themselves that the institutions of higher le...  [Read More]
Posted in: The future of the Republican Party
 GarfieldJL
02-23-2009, 9:37 PM
#42
Well, these past few posts have been quite educational. I now have a better idea of what actually occurs when matter and antimatter come into close proximity with one another. Sadly I've actually seen worse. Anyways, my point is several universit...  [Read More]
Posted in: The future of the Republican Party
 GarfieldJL
02-23-2009, 12:52 PM
#40
Please. Lets not resort to irrational hyperbole. There are clearly "loonies" in both camps of political ideology. Intellectual discourse is damaged by such characterizations and unfair generalizations. Or at least this is what you've been a...  [Read More]
Posted in: The future of the Republican Party
 GarfieldJL
02-22-2009, 9:47 PM
#36
Which would fall into the religious category of people. Right or left has little to do with that. I was simply clarifying that this state is hardly as "leftist" and "democratic" as the rest of the country would like to believe. Y...  [Read More]
Posted in: The future of the Republican Party
 GarfieldJL
02-21-2009, 10:24 PM
#33
We may vote Democrat in the presidential elections, but we have a Republican in power and on inner state matters we more often vote Republican. Why? Because we are a coasted state. Meaning, a good part of the military and navy exist out here. Calif...  [Read More]
Posted in: The future of the Republican Party
 GarfieldJL
02-21-2009, 3:40 PM
#30
You're analysis may be formed from preconceived bias and lack of understanding. Perhaps you're a conservative and consider yourself republican (I honestly don't care and actually detest politics in general), but my statements, while not supported at...  [Read More]
Posted in: The future of the Republican Party
 GarfieldJL
02-02-2009, 8:51 PM
#19
Well, here is the thing, was it the Republicans that lost or the unethical behavior of the Media that caused the Democrats to be elected. Seriously, if it were the results of just people going to the left, it wouldn't explain why the constitutional...  [Read More]
Posted in: The future of the Republican Party
 GarfieldJL
02-02-2009, 7:47 PM
#17
Excuse me? I'm a Republican and I consider those comments to be out of line, the Republican's base has always been Military, Religious Conservatives, etc. People had better hope the Republicans manage to remain a major party or this country is in r...  [Read More]
Posted in: Brotherhood of Shadow - Expansion Pack
 GarfieldJL
02-02-2009, 12:29 PM
#468
For the record for my Jawa Shop mod I have no edited git files of tatooine, nor any edited 2da files, I only touched the on enter script (k_ptat17_enter) to spawn my entrance, everything else is pretty much self contained in the modules. The only glo...  [Read More]
Posted in: Brotherhood of Shadow - Expansion Pack
 GarfieldJL
01-30-2009, 11:20 PM
#465
Those are the problem files usually for a glitch like this... other than that... :giveup: It's also got it so one of your mods stopped working specifically the Jawa's shop mod, I imagine it's still there but I can't access it now....  [Read More]
Page: 2 of 33