Note: LucasForums Archive Project
The content here was reconstructed by scraping the Wayback Machine in an effort to restore some of what was lost when LF went down. The LucasForums Archive Project claims no ownership over the content or assets that were archived on archive.org.

This project is meant for research purposes only.
 

GarfieldJL

Latest Posts

Page: 11 of 33
Posted in: Michael Moore's take on the results
  GarfieldJL
11-05-2008, 12:59 PM
#8
Oh yeah! Rush Limbaugh is a great guy! A liar, a pill-popper, a pig. Say what you will about Michael Moore, I'm not a fan of him either, but that letter really displayed how he DOES actually care. The difference between Michael Moore and Rush Limba...  [Read More]
Posted in: Michael Moore's take on the results
  GarfieldJL
11-05-2008, 12:53 PM
#6
Lol. About as I would expect Moore to be. He missed Nixon. Anti-Vietnam war elected on the promise of getting us out of Vietnam. Of course he went for the more insulting route. If anyone hurts the Democrat party it is him(much as Rush hurts the Repub...  [Read More]
Posted in: Michael Moore's take on the results
  GarfieldJL
11-05-2008, 12:48 PM
#2
Yet another reason why I did not support Obama, nor do I trust Obama......  [Read More]
Posted in: Would Obama have won if he had kept his pledge for public financing?
  GarfieldJL
11-05-2008, 1:06 PM
#15
Where is the consideration required to make a legal contract under American law? The United States allows for Oral contracts to be made, while it is harder to prosecute someone over an oral contract, if you have a video tape or audio tape it does...  [Read More]
Posted in: Would Obama have won if he had kept his pledge for public financing?
  GarfieldJL
11-05-2008, 1:00 PM
#13
Agreed, but he did not break any contract as you implied. I will go as far to say Obama would have been stupid not to change his mind when conditions change. That is the reason I supported Obama he will change as conditions change. :xp: No, technica...  [Read More]
Posted in: Would Obama have won if he had kept his pledge for public financing?
  GarfieldJL
11-05-2008, 12:46 PM
#9
No, because you're not going to do it, not here. I will not tolerate even another month of what you've been doing since you started posting here. You want to say "I told you so"? Kindly take it somewhere else. Are you threatening me? Ser...  [Read More]
Posted in: Would Obama have won if he had kept his pledge for public financing?
  GarfieldJL
11-05-2008, 12:39 PM
#6
What consideration did Obama recieve for the contract? None. Then there is no contract. Obama on Public Financing 1 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsOnmKK5j6Y&eurl=http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/19/breaking-obama-passes-on-public-financin...  [Read More]
Posted in: Would Obama have won if he had kept his pledge for public financing?
  GarfieldJL
11-05-2008, 11:12 AM
#3
First Obama did not break any laws or contracts. He said he would negotiate with the Republican nominee, and that it all. Once the money started rolling in Obama would have been a fool to limit the money he could spend especially considering the mone...  [Read More]
Posted in: Would Obama have won if he had kept his pledge for public financing?
  GarfieldJL
11-05-2008, 10:26 AM
#1
While I congradulate him on his victory, I'm just curious would he have won if he had kept his pledge to take public funding? He spent well over $700,000,000 dollars, compared to McCain's approx $84,000,000. He had several major news networks in t...  [Read More]
Posted in: Obama Civilian Security?
  GarfieldJL
11-04-2008, 6:02 PM
#51
1. Obama is NOT a socialist, even if some of his policies have socialist tendencies. His friends are socialists, he has several socialist policies, including wanting to "spread the wealth around" there's an old saying, if it walks like a...  [Read More]
Posted in: Obama Civilian Security?
  GarfieldJL
11-04-2008, 3:45 PM
#48
Is my tin foil hat just not on tight enough? I don't understand how it flows logically that if Obama wants a security force to protect the internals of the country from terrorism that directly equates to Secret Gestapo Thought Police force of Sociali...  [Read More]
Posted in: Obama Civilian Security?
  GarfieldJL
11-04-2008, 3:30 PM
#46
This doesn't even make sense. What would they be arrested for? And who's to say that the media isn't being wiretapped? And the NSA is wiretapping. Well the objective of abusing power like that would usually be towards eliminating political rivals....  [Read More]
Posted in: Obama Civilian Security?
  GarfieldJL
11-04-2008, 2:37 PM
#41
oh wait all you did is dodge the question and regurgitate a bush administration talking point about how the nsa isn't illegally wiretapping people. thanks. If this were true, wouldn't a lot of the Mainstream Media and President Bush's other enemies...  [Read More]
Posted in: Obama Civilian Security?
  GarfieldJL
11-04-2008, 11:16 AM
#37
Then why not get Judicial Approval? Whose to say they didn't try to obtain judicial approval after the conversation was concluded (permission to listen in on phone conversations that occur with the phone that is in the United States). Seriously, d...  [Read More]
Posted in: Obama Civilian Security?
  GarfieldJL
11-04-2008, 11:01 AM
#35
Not without judicial oversight. Why should the citizens be expected to follow laws when our own government does not follow the rules the government itself created. Also something in the Oath of Office that says the presents swears to “preserve,...  [Read More]
Posted in: Obama Civilian Security?
  GarfieldJL
11-04-2008, 10:48 AM
#32
Garfield, it seems as though you've just missed mimartin's entire point. He said that he was fine with wiretapping. Why? Because it might help save American lives, and the fact that it is/was overseen by the Judicial Branch. However, what Bush did wa...  [Read More]
Posted in: Obama Civilian Security?
  GarfieldJL
11-04-2008, 10:33 AM
#30
I have no problem with wiretaps, so you can stop right there. I have a problem with no judicial oversight and that does not matter if you are calling ten miles away or half way around the world. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 gave...  [Read More]
Posted in: Obama Civilian Security?
  GarfieldJL
11-04-2008, 10:22 AM
#28
That is your own ignorant and scaremongering opinion. It is based on little credible evidence and is an outright smear. If you'd like to provide hardcore evidence of a Democrat gestapo, then I'd like to see it. Because if I remember correctly, we've...  [Read More]
Posted in: Tom Brokaw: Asking the Right Questions About Obama
  GarfieldJL
11-04-2008, 4:14 PM
#86
Do you really believe the reason we are there makes any difference to terrorist attempting to kill American troops? Not to them, but I sincerely believe they've actually lost their recruiting base bigtime, especially since their attacks have lately...  [Read More]
Posted in: Tom Brokaw: Asking the Right Questions About Obama
  GarfieldJL
11-04-2008, 4:05 PM
#84
They want to kill Americans and get more recruits. McCain wants to stay in Iraq thus making it easier to kill Americans and get more recruits to defend their holy land from the evil invaders. They don’t care who the President is, they just want to...  [Read More]
Posted in: Tom Brokaw: Asking the Right Questions About Obama
  GarfieldJL
11-04-2008, 3:39 PM
#80
You keep forgetting that McCain got the all important Al-Qaeda endorsement. :xp: An endorsement I'm still wondering why the heck they were dumb enough to give, unless they think McCain is just going to be playing hide and seek. :loco: That's assumi...  [Read More]
Posted in: Tom Brokaw: Asking the Right Questions About Obama
  GarfieldJL
11-04-2008, 3:35 PM
#78
So I may have used the wrong word, but you've not addressed the point. Oh but I have, when Reagan met with Gorbachev, he did so after months of low-level diplomats having meetings and there were conditions attached. When President Kennedy tried to...  [Read More]
Posted in: Tom Brokaw: Asking the Right Questions About Obama
  GarfieldJL
11-04-2008, 3:11 PM
#75
Because i'm sure Obama tells people if they can or can't support him. :dozey: I'm saying they support him because he believes as they do. Can you prove that they want him in so they can make nukes? No? I can prove that Hamas and Hezbolla endors...  [Read More]
Posted in: Tom Brokaw: Asking the Right Questions About Obama
  GarfieldJL
11-04-2008, 2:41 PM
#71
Whoever becomes the President of the USA is going to have a big impact on the rest of the world - I think it's refreshing that not only has Obama courted American voters, but they've also tried to improve relations with other countries and world lead...  [Read More]
Posted in: Why the Mainstream Media has next to no credibility
  GarfieldJL
11-04-2008, 10:29 AM
#30
http://journalism.org/node/13436 It seems to me Fox News did a far better job....  [Read More]
Page: 11 of 33