Note: LucasForums Archive Project
The content here was reconstructed by scraping the Wayback Machine in an effort to restore some of what was lost when LF went down. The LucasForums Archive Project claims no ownership over the content or assets that were archived on archive.org.

This project is meant for research purposes only.
 

mimartin

Latest Posts

Page: 28 of 52
Posted in: Michael Moore's take on the results
 mimartin
11-05-2008, 2:42 PM
#19
So you're saying that America WAS NOT built by genocide and on the back of slaves? Yea, I saw no argument with Moore on that. While Moore is a little too far to the left for my taste, he made a point there that I cannot disagree with. While that part...  [Read More]
I have not lost anything, fact is Obama made the pledge/contract, McCain started into the Public Financing and then Obama renigged. That is a breach of contract. Hedging your bet now? Earlier you said it was a contract. First off I must apologize t...  [Read More]
By admitting that McCain was locked in even before Obama made the decision to accept private financing, you've effectively demonstrated that it wasn't Obama's fault under promissory estoppel that McCain had spending limits. Thanks for making my argum...  [Read More]
You need to read the bills that made it to Bush's desk because Bush cannot vote in the United States Senate. Did I misread Rogue Nine's comment. I thought Rogue Nine's comment about Bush involved Bush's policies not bills. Oh, and my history may be v...  [Read More]
Well, looks like we'll have to hold him to the consequences for breaching the contract outlined in the contract. Let us give him the worse punishment possible, he has to clean up the mess Bush has made. Actually there is because you can define it a...  [Read More]
Correction, it does constitute consideration because Senator McCain acted upon it in good faith to his detriment. --Promissory Estoppel (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estoppel#Promissory_estoppel) American law In the many jurisdictions of the Unite...  [Read More]
At the time he didn't have that money though, when he made the pledge it was back in 2007 when the primaries were underway, he stood to gain politically by taking the public funds pledge for the general election, that he wouldn't secumb to special in...  [Read More]
Remember, I satisified all the conditions that you gave as far as a contract is concerned. No, you failed to get past the consideration part....  [Read More]
The fact remains that he was not in breach of contract, the absolute most you can argue is that he broke his word.Fixed...  [Read More]
McCain however had made the pledge as well, and McCain was the Republican Nominee, so Obama was in breach of contract. You know saying something over and over does not make it true. Even the Republican Contract with American was not a legal contrac...  [Read More]
Consideration: Both would end up on same footing with no way for either side to gain an overwhelming advantage. (this is actually the most contraversial requirement for a contract) Thus both receive something. (neither Obama nor McCain expected to ge...  [Read More]
The United States allows for Oral contracts to be made, while it is harder to prosecute someone over an oral contract, if you have a video tape or audio tape it does show that there is indeed a contract. Yes they do. So again I ask where is the consi...  [Read More]
No, technically if you look at the definition I found, he did break a contract, you can have an oral contract, especially if there is a video record. Some wills are on audio or video tape. Where is the consideration required to make a legal contract...  [Read More]
Seems to me that he did break his word. Agreed, but he did not break any contract as you implied. I will go as far to say Obama would have been stupid not to change his mind when conditions change. That is the reason I supported Obama he will change...  [Read More]
Technically he did, I did some checking and he did break a contract. What consideration did Obama recieve for the contract? None. Then there is no contract. Oh, yea it was Obama that distorted the truth about McCain in his ads. :rolleyes: :lol:...  [Read More]
First Obama did not break any laws or contracts. He said he would negotiate with the Republican nominee, and that is all. Once the money started rolling in Obama would have been a fool to limit the money he could spend especially considering the mone...  [Read More]
Posted in: Obama Civilian Security?
 mimartin
11-04-2008, 3:32 PM
#47
Is my tin foil hat just not on tight enough? You need to tighten the tin foil hat around your neck to have it make sense. :nut:...  [Read More]
Posted in: Obama Civilian Security?
 mimartin
11-04-2008, 11:28 AM
#38
You can't get blanket approval, you need to have a specific name or specific group with some probable cause to obtain a warrant. Just in case someone is actually reading this looking for facts. Blanket Wiretaps (http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/s...  [Read More]
Posted in: Tom Brokaw: Asking the Right Questions About Obama
 mimartin
11-04-2008, 4:24 PM
#87
Not to them, but I sincerely believe they've actually lost their recruiting base bigtime, especially since their attacks have lately been on Iraqi civilians and not American troops. You think! Could it be that we have more American there due to the...  [Read More]
Posted in: Tom Brokaw: Asking the Right Questions About Obama
 mimartin
11-04-2008, 4:09 PM
#85
Do you really believe the reason we are there makes any difference to terrorist attempting to kill American troops?...  [Read More]
Posted in: Tom Brokaw: Asking the Right Questions About Obama
 mimartin
11-04-2008, 3:59 PM
#83
I don't see what's wrong with that. Please, elaborate as to why you think this is a bad move on Obama's part. It is not true. It is a story that was made up. Obama never said the President of the United States would set down with anyone. Obama: Se...  [Read More]
Posted in: Tom Brokaw: Asking the Right Questions About Obama
 mimartin
11-04-2008, 3:46 PM
#81
An endorsement I'm still wondering why the heck they were dumb enough to give, unless they think McCain is just going to be playing hide and seek. :loco:They want to kill Americans and get more recruits. McCain wants to stay in Iraq thus making it ea...  [Read More]
Posted in: Tom Brokaw: Asking the Right Questions About Obama
 mimartin
11-04-2008, 3:36 PM
#79
I can prove that Hamas and Hezbolla endorsed him.You keep forgetting that McCain got the all important Al-Qaeda endorsement. :xp: You're missing the point, I'm not saying low-level diplomatic talks won't help, but just flying in on Air Force One (whi...  [Read More]
Posted in: Tom Brokaw: Asking the Right Questions About Obama
 mimartin
11-04-2008, 2:57 PM
#73
Uh huh, yeah leaders like Chavez supporting him... Yeah, this is yet another reason why I would vote for Donald Duck or Hillary Clinton over Obama.So you allow foreign entities to affect your vote. Let us not forget some of McCain’s dubious end...  [Read More]
Posted in: Tom Brokaw: Asking the Right Questions About Obama
 mimartin
11-04-2008, 12:23 PM
#67
And yet I assume you're not going to stop Obama-bashing :)I'm rooting for 8 years of Obama-bashing. Let's get Ken Starr out of retirement. :D...  [Read More]
Page: 28 of 52