yeah, man because everyone is out to get you.:rolleyes: seriously grow up and learn that not everything is about you and what you want. kthxbai.

I wonder if Yae is coming back.....

yes, I will. and I dont want an army to fight the mods, I just want the admin or something to do something about mods who are hypcrites. I've been said I was banned for my Japan thing, flaming, harrassing, which is it? All of those said by different people. Please, do, tell.

This is a thread for questions about the forums that arent worth a whole thread. here's two.

1. Whats the worst a sig can be before you get banned?

2. What do you do if you ban someone with 300 posts in a temp-ban. Do u make thier sig say- Banned? since they dont have enough posts for a title?

It was all of the above combined.

The fact that you did all of them resulted in your temp ban, had you done a single one it would have simply been a warning.

And pray do tell, which of us are the hypocrites, and how have we hypocrasied?

I was nver warned for the Japan thing, it was closed rather quickly once I started rambling, and please tell my specific instances where I flamed and another when I harrassed. The hyprocrites are...Lynk and Jed. Maybe more, but I cant tihnk of them off the top of my head.

1.) There is no set limit on how bad we allow, if it's highly offensive then we will first ask that it be changed without banning, unless it is explicit porn...then it's a direct out ban.


2.) The custom title always reads banned when people get banned. Even if they only have 1 post. :)

You call us hypcrites yet you are one yourself. And not that I say that out of the blue. I refer to the "rules should apply to mods aswell" thread where you called me a jerk without even knowing me. Lukely for you Iґm not that vindicatory.

First of all I advice you to have a look at SkinWalkerґs post a bit up and read it over a few times. He explained very will that discussion about peopleґs believe can pull em slightly over the edge when they are not supposed to. It isnґt always ment and people shouldnґt take everything that serious what happens around here. This is not a point to say you or the otherґs behaviour was good/bad but just something people should keep in mind.

As for the reason you were banned. In some cases your bevahiour was completely uncalled for. You tried to put TK on his place when all he was doing was his job. A thing you shouldnґt be doing. Secondly you followed Lynk to "his" section and harassed him over there what was completely unacceptable.

I donґt have any problems with you as you make really good posts towards the Battlefront community. But its just your behaviour that has to tuned a bit. Chill, donґt take everything so personal, try to be friends with people and youґll do just fine. ;)

You went in RSN and started posting in LJ's thread saying "Spy on the people in Japan for me!!1!!1"

Just because something is closed doesn't mean you weren't warned.

and when/if they get unbanned, do they now have a cutsom title despite their lack of posts?

and I find insanesiths sig offensive.

oh, and I wanted my title to be 'Rubber Banned' but it makes ****** when I try to type banned, whats the deal?

For starters, I never harrassed Lynk, if you call what I posted to him harrassment, then I saw when you posted, 'Noob, Kill Yourself' harrassment ,and would say you should be banned. and I never said you were a jerk. I said if I got to know you, you probably would be one, simply because of the people you hang out with. (I may have called u a jerk, if I did, please quote it and post it here.)

and I was never wanred about the spy on japan for me thing. If I was warned by way of pm, I would have glsdly edited it out.

Originally posted by yaebginn
and when/if they get unbanned, do they now have a cutsom title despite their lack of posts?

and I find insanesiths sig offensive.

oh, and I wanted my title to be 'Rubber Banned' but it makes ****** when I try to type banned, whats the deal?
When they get unbanned their title will exactly be the same as it was before the ban.

Noted.

Banned is a forbidden word as custom title. I think there are more but I have no idea what they are.

This doesnґt exactly contribute to the thread ;)

~ Pad

Originally posted by yaebginn
I was nver warned for the Japan thing, it was closed rather quickly once I started rambling, and please tell my specific instances where I flamed and another when I harrassed. The hyprocrites are...Lynk and Jed. Maybe more, but I cant tihnk of them off the top of my head. when you followed lynk over the rsn, you were there for no other reason than to harrass him. Your constant anti-japanese comments and paranoid delusions are harrassment especially on a forum with high international users and are rather trollish, namely that stint on the old lady ninja in disguise. And your argument in the jar-jar thread just proves how obsessed you are with opposing people and provoking arguments that should not even take place.


posted by you yaeb
I am against ET because he acts like a jerk.

http://www.lucasforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=133546)


posted by you yaeb
Pad, I dnt know you, if I got to know you, I probably wouldnt like you either, but you never know
that's not very nice



I'll gather some more if you want. :)

Originally posted by yaebginn
For starters, I never harrassed Lynk, if you call what I posted to him harrassment, then I saw when you posted, 'Noob, Kill Yourself' harrassment ,and would say you should be banned. and I never said you were a jerk. I said if I got to know you, you probably would be one, simply because of the people you hang out with. (I may have called u a jerk, if I did, please quote it and post it here.)

and I was never wanred about the spy on japan for me thing. If I was warned by way of pm, I would have glsdly edited it out.

First, that pic was to get you to just shut up because you were acting like an idiot. Apparently, you're the only one who took in in offence. However, a lot of people found many of your posts offensive.

And, I doubt you would have edited.

Originally posted by yaebginn
I was never wanred about the spy on japan for me thing. If I was warned by way of pm, I would have glsdly edited it out. yes you were, lynk posted a warning directly in the thread.
Originally posted by Lynk Former
yaebginn, you start screwing around with me here and I'll ban you. Understood?

sounds like a warning to me.

Originally posted by yaebginn
and I find insanesiths sig offensive.
what exactly is offensive about it?

Originally posted by ZBomber
This doesnґt exactly contribute to the thread ;)

~ Pad

And this thread doesn't really have a purpose. :p He gave his opinion, I gave mine :xp:

Originally posted by InsaneSith
what exactly is offensive about it?
After reviewing it I agree. You say itґs offensive to you which makes me think about your age. People "can" join LF when they are 13 and last time I checked thatґs right in puberty where such thoughts are generated every split second.

Also note that such text can be found on various websites that are publicly viewable. Are you going on crusade to make them take it away. I think not. Personally I think you said that just to provoke.

If I made my sig, 'Mods R Gay,' you'd be offended and make me chnage it, I'll continue once you confirm or deny this statement. oh, and it doesnt matter about age, I am offended to see someone say that sex was in anyway meant for babies to have it. (and if its not meant that way, then I can say that my idea says that mods are happy)

Originally posted by yaebginn
I am offended to see someone say that sex was in anyway meant for babies to have it.

.....what? :eyeraise:

Mods R Gay would be insulting someone. Saying sex is not JUST for babies isn't insulting anyone, it's telling the truth.

Originally posted by yaebginn
I am offended to see someone say that sex was in anyway meant for babies to have it. (and if its not meant that way, then I can say that my idea says that mods are happy) .... you are very thick headed, the point was that sex isn't just meant to procreate anymore, but more about pleasure and enjoyment.

Originally posted by ZBomber
Mods R Gay would be insulting someone. only if used in a negative fashion, which going by previous posts from yaebginn one can only assume he means it negatively.

Well, I was going to say that saying mods r gay is a direct attack on mods....Siths sig isn't attacking anyone, it's just stating a point....but two people have already said that before me...so....er.....yeah. And you wouldn't be meaning mods are happy and joyful if you said we're gay. That meaning of gay has become outdated and is no longer in use.

Originally posted by InsaneSith
.... you are very thick headed, the point was that sex isn't just meant to procreate anymore, but more about pleasure and enjoyment.

only if used in a negative fashion, which going by previous posts from yaebginn one can only assume he means it negatively.

You know what I meant.... :p

Wait a minute... there is this guy, Crazy dog No. 3 i believe, that has 'Banned' as his custom title...


How is that possible?

he probably had it set to that before they made it a censored word for titles.

Originally posted by Doomgiver
Wait a minute... there is this guy, Crazy dog No. 3 i believe, that has 'Banned' as his custom title...


How is that possible?

Or he requested it from an admin.

I didnt start the jar jar argument, that was either u or ET, I forget. displaying how u act like jerks. I didnt follow lynk, I followed Redwing. I saw he was the mod of rpg forums, so I clickedo n his name and saw he posted in a thread called had to clean the room a bit. so I then saw lynk post there, so I posted as well, and went on to explore the forum. I was wanred abotu not screwing around with lynk, but lynk didnt post in the wedding thread. so I didnt screw around with him. and I said probably, not definitely, mostly because of who pad hangs out with. and if he is the love-parent of zbomber, (check out zbombers title) then hes probably someone I wouldnt like. you doubt, but dont know for sure. and no one else found it offense because it wasnt directed at them, it was directed at me.

how would it be attacking? From what I gather from your guys posts in debates, nothing is wrong with being gay, so it wouldnt be offensive, just incorrect information. And dont know it means that before you told me, ok, I am telling you that my future sig, 'Mods R Gay' is saying that mods are happy.

Originally posted by yaebginn
I didnt start the jar jar argument, that was either u or ET, I forget. displaying how u act like jerks. I didnt follow lynk, I followed Redwing. I saw he was the mod of rpg forums, so I clickedo n his name and saw he posted in a thread called had to clean the room a bit. so I then saw lynk post there, so I posted as well, and went on to explore the forum. I was wanred abotu not screwing around with lynk, but lynk didnt post in the wedding thread. so I didnt screw around with him. and I said probably, not definitely, mostly because of who pad hangs out with. and if he is the love-parent of zbomber, (check out zbombers title) then hes probably someone I wouldnt like. you doubt, but dont know for sure. and no one else found it offense because it wasnt directed at them, it was directed at me.

Actually, I get all my assness from Jed..... Pad is quite nice, and I'm sure he's having problems trying to not flame you for your ignorance.

Originally posted by yaebginn
how would it be attacking? From what I gather from your guys posts in debates, nothing is wrong with being gay, so it wouldnt be offensive, just incorrect information. And dont know it means that before you told me, ok, I am telling you that my future sig, 'Mods R Gay' is saying that mods are happy.

Because we aren't stupid and we know what you are trying to say by putting that in your sig.

Go ahead, put it in your sig if you are so curious.

thats flaming, calling me stupid. something one of you said I was banned for. and you wonder why I call you hyprocrites. and myabe Pad is nice, if I get to know Pad, and decide he is a nice guy, I will retract my statement and apologise for doubting.

you're right, there isn't anything wrong with being gay, but going by your past posts and your obvious stance on homosexuality, it obviously carries a negative attitude when you say it.

and please don't try to argue semantics with us little boy.

but by all means put it in your sig, I won't stop you.

Itґs always someone other then you who did/start it wasnґt? :rolleyes:

And it doensґt matter who you followed to that thread. Heck, there is even nothing wrong with you posting in that thread. Itґs the WAY you posted it.
now hes bugging me on the battlefront forums. u should see him.
Think about it. And if it wasnґt ment, I advice you to think a bit longer about things before you post them.

And how do you know who I hang out with? It doesnґt mean Iґm mentioned in someone custom title I actually have something to do with him. For all I know, he could be a fan of mine.

And get your facts straight. This thread is why you were banned, the other one is about that "offensive sig".

Originally posted by yaebginn
thats flaming, calling me stupid. something one of you said I was banned for. and you wonder why I call you hyprocrites. and myabe Pad is nice, if I get to know Pad, and decide he is a nice guy, I will retract my statement and apologise for doubting. we're advising zbomber on changing his wording thank you. and also, you never included zed in your original arguments (I can do semantics too ;) )

Originally posted by yaebginn
I didnt start the jar jar argument, that was either u or ET, I forget.

From the Jar-Jar Thread

Originally posted by ET Warrior
His character is important, but I hate his VOICE. that high pitch squeeky voice makes me want to jam a pencil in my ear.

Originally posted by yaebginn
his character isnt even that important.


YOU started the debate there, for no real purpose :dozey:

Originally posted by yaebginn
thats flaming, calling me stupid. something one of you said I was banned for. and you wonder why I call you hyprocrites. and myabe Pad is nice, if I get to know Pad, and decide he is a nice guy, I will retract my statement and apologise for doubting.

? I wish I knew what you were talking about..... why not give Pad a chance instead of just dissing him?

but if a guy who hates americans calls me ' You American!' with a snarl, I wont be offended, because its ok to be an american. or if someone says, ' You republican!' they mean that as an insult, but I wont be offended. and but how do you know what I mean? You dont know what goes on in this mind of mine. I can think mods are happy if I like. and according to my way of reading your sig, insanesith, you think that sex was used for babies to fornicate, and I find that offensive.

nice job editing it, 'preciate it. and I mentioned mods in general, try again. and bedcause I disagrre with you, that starts a debate, et? I dont think so. and pad, I dont get your last sentecne, this thread was created while I was banned, and the offensive sig thing hasnt been created yet.

you know what yaeb, you wanna put Mods R Gay in your sig? You go right ahead, we might miss having you around here when you get banned :dozey:

Originally posted by yaebginn
but if a guy who hates americans calls me ' You American!' with a snarl, I wont be offended, because its ok to be an american. or if someone says, ' You republican!' they mean that as an insult, but I wont be offended. and but how do you know what I mean? You dont know what goes on in this mind of mine. I can think mods are happy if I like. and according to my way of reading your sig, insanesith, you think that sex was used for babies to fornicate, and I find that offensive. ... you just love looking for trouble don't you?
My sig does not in any fashion incite the notion of sex with a baby, well it might if you have the IQ of a retarded eggplant. If you really want to say mods are happy, say mods are happy, no need to pull a semantics argument of gay means happy, you clearly have not meant it that way in the past. I do not know what's going on in your mind, but I can judge your attitude and terminology on previous posts by you, thus giving me some incite into your posting attitude and meaning.

and why would I get banned?

btw heres another question- can a mod in another forum thats not a supermod ban someone in a different forum? I man enitrely different forums, like the jkforums and battlefront forums.

Originally posted by yaebginn
nice job editing it, 'preciate it. and I mentioned mods in general, try again. and bedcause I disagrre with you, that starts a debate, et? I dont think so. and pad, I dont get your last sentecne, this thread was created while I was banned, and the offensive sig thing hasnt been created yet.


:dozey:

He means the topic of the thread is why are you banned.......

you think that sex was used for babies to fornicate, and I find that offensive.

Actually, he's saying that Sex isn't just meant to reproduce anymore (Was that the right word?), but in our modern society, has become a way to gain pleasure. That just comes with being intelligent and being able to feel pleasure: You want pleasure.

He's not saying that sex used to be done by babies, and that religious people still see it that way...

Come on, you knew that, didn't you? You just wanted to try and find a reason to discredit him, or not?

You've changed since you first logged on to these forums...

It's Rhett!

I ahve changed. I mean, I got banned, for one.

bedcause I disagrre with you, that starts a debate, et? I dont think so.

Actually...yes. That's how debate is formed, I make a point, you disagree, I defend my point, you refute, and so on and so forth.

but you and insanesith made it into a debate about reagan and clinton. Until I get responses from a few mods pms, I'm gonna stop posting for a bit.

Originally posted by yaebginn
but you and insanesith made it into a debate about reagan and clinton. bull, I didn't make it into a debate, I went in there when it already was. Kthxbai.

my apologies, I often get you two confused.

Originally posted by yaebginn
my apologies, I often get you two confused.

It's because we have our hair cut the same way. We look alot alike :dozey:



And I didn't make that thread into a debate abour reagan, I took the debate you made in there and utilized it in the thread that was already debating reagan.