Note: LucasForums Archive Project
The content here was reconstructed by scraping the Wayback Machine in an effort to restore some of what was lost when LF went down. The LucasForums Archive Project claims no ownership over the content or assets that were archived on archive.org.

This project is meant for research purposes only.
 

GarfieldJL

Latest Posts

Page: 32 of 33
Posted in: These are the Kinds of People the US is fighting around the world
  GarfieldJL
05-08-2007, 8:15 PM
#15
Actually the United States Constitution clearly states that it is the President whom is the commander and chief not a mob....  [Read More]
Posted in: These are the Kinds of People the US is fighting around the world
  GarfieldJL
05-08-2007, 5:28 PM
#10
I don't think Hamas cares about the kids other than as human bombs....  [Read More]
Posted in: These are the Kinds of People the US is fighting around the world
  GarfieldJL
05-08-2007, 10:57 AM
#7
Anyone showing videos like that to kids in the US would likely find themselves in trouble with Child Protective Services and the cops for child abuse. Yeah well this is what Hamas is airing for children in Palestian territories to watch....  [Read More]
Posted in: These are the Kinds of People the US is fighting around the world
  GarfieldJL
05-07-2007, 8:45 PM
#5
There was censorship during World War II, it was to prevent the enemy from gaining information concerning our forces, that's what I'm saying the media is doing. Troop morale isn't like it was in Vietnam, it's a lot higher and many of our troops think...  [Read More]
Posted in: These are the Kinds of People the US is fighting around the world
  GarfieldJL
05-07-2007, 8:29 PM
#3
True, however we can't run a war by committee, nor can it be ran by popular opinion. The terrorists pay attention to our media, and they gain confidence from our media....  [Read More]
Posted in: These are the Kinds of People the US is fighting around the world
  GarfieldJL
05-07-2007, 7:57 PM
#1
Hamas Mickey Mouse (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,270457,00.html) There is also a video that accompanies it, these people try to train children to be suicide bombers to want to kill nonmuslims....  [Read More]
Posted in: Force Unleashed question
  GarfieldJL
05-06-2007, 5:29 PM
#10
I think they still don't have a story for K3 is the problem....  [Read More]
Posted in: Taking it Out on the Troops
  GarfieldJL
05-13-2007, 12:03 AM
#58
Okay, first of all people seem to be neglecting several key points. 1. Congress did basically authorize the war in Iraq. 2. Article 2 of the United States Congress states that it is the President of the United States that is in charge of our armed...  [Read More]
Posted in: Taking it Out on the Troops
  GarfieldJL
05-10-2007, 10:14 PM
#48
but thats what they're trying to do. Saying: here's the money....BUT...you have to be out of there by X. Or you have to have X soldiers in there by X or no money. But Bush has repeatedly said the only legislation he WONT veto, is one that says "...  [Read More]
Posted in: Taking it Out on the Troops
  GarfieldJL
05-10-2007, 12:52 PM
#44
To be honest, congress has absolutely no business giving the Generals on the ground time tables. The Generals have more knowledge of the situation than congress....  [Read More]
Posted in: Taking it Out on the Troops
  GarfieldJL
05-08-2007, 11:02 AM
#33
Ever occur to you that the dems are more concerned about trying to undermine our President, then they are concerned about the troops. Since Clinton practically gutted the CIA, it is rather probable that Bush was being completely honest with the Amer...  [Read More]
Posted in: Taking it Out on the Troops
  GarfieldJL
05-07-2007, 8:37 PM
#29
If we manage to succeed in Iraq we will have dealt a crippling blow to Al Queda and possibly set off things in Iran and Syria, best case a revolution....  [Read More]
Posted in: Taking it Out on the Troops
  GarfieldJL
05-07-2007, 7:17 PM
#27
My question is why the heck was Al Sadr in the then tightest police state in the world, if Saddam had absolutely nothing to do with Al Queda. I'd also like to know where several tons of Anthrax went. Seriously, even though I know I can't prove it, I...  [Read More]
Posted in: Taking it Out on the Troops
  GarfieldJL
05-04-2007, 9:04 AM
#22
Okay, whether or not we should have gone into Iraq is moot we're there now. As far as the situation in Iraq, pulling out would be just plain stupid. As far as Pelosi and Reid, if it were World War II and they went to meet with Hitler, they would be e...  [Read More]
Posted in: Should Bush Be Impeached?
  GarfieldJL
05-09-2007, 4:47 PM
#67
You want to go about stem cells, I have no problem with using Stem Cells from an umbilical cord or adult stem cells, I have a problem with going in and destroying human lives to harvest cells. The reason why I'm against abortion is because there is n...  [Read More]
Posted in: Should Bush Be Impeached?
  GarfieldJL
05-07-2007, 10:07 PM
#60
Isn't the happy birthday song from before Warner Bros. even existed? If so and they aren't the original author, their copyright doesn't stand up in court. Also Warner Brothers had to back down from things before. One involved them being counter sued...  [Read More]
Posted in: Should Bush Be Impeached?
  GarfieldJL
05-07-2007, 7:10 PM
#58
You're allowed to sing a song and it wasn't for commercial purposes. Furthermore, the legality of copyrighting "Happy Birthday" is questionable. Not to mention this is more of splitting hairs....  [Read More]
Posted in: Should Bush Be Impeached?
  GarfieldJL
05-07-2007, 4:09 PM
#54
Demanding a time table to withdraw with dates, handing over Iraq to the terrorists. Saying that the war in Iraq is lost. (Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said that) Going to Syria despite the objections of the White House. (Nancy Pelosi Democrat)...  [Read More]
Posted in: Should Bush Be Impeached?
  GarfieldJL
05-07-2007, 3:07 PM
#52
The situation is that the Democrats are hurting our troops while doing this, it is emboldening the terrorists in Iraq and I believe the Democrats are well aware of this and are doing it to undermine the President and pull the rug out from under our t...  [Read More]
Posted in: Should Bush Be Impeached?
  GarfieldJL
05-04-2007, 7:59 PM
#49
Please. Show us. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_did_not_have_sexual_relations_with_that_woman http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paula_Jones In April 1999, about two months after being acquitted by the Senate, Clinton was cited by Federal District Judg...  [Read More]
Posted in: Should Bush Be Impeached?
  GarfieldJL
05-04-2007, 7:46 PM
#47
So you say perjury isn't a crime, seriously people go to prison for years for committing perjury. If Clinton had admitted about the affair it would have made him look bad, but he couldn't be impeached over it. Face it Clinton lied before a federal gr...  [Read More]
Posted in: Should Bush Be Impeached?
  GarfieldJL
05-04-2007, 9:17 AM
#43
I don't consider Bush being impeached as being completely out of the realm of possibility. Far from it. Something solid and clearly defined that the general public can latch onto would be all that it would take. The situation with former President Cl...  [Read More]
Posted in: Should Bush Be Impeached?
  GarfieldJL
05-02-2007, 11:20 AM
#30
Blackmailing someone into voting for something that they are staunchly opposed by stating that their State isn't going to get needed aid otherwise and it will be used against them in the 08 election is blackmail. Furthermore, are those charges from...  [Read More]
Posted in: Should Bush Be Impeached?
  GarfieldJL
05-02-2007, 10:57 AM
#28
Yeah, but they don't have the 2/3 majority to override the veto. They barely had a majority to get it passed in the first place. It also had a lot of completely unrelated crap/pork added to it, just to make that more interesting. They had pork in...  [Read More]
Posted in: Why Do People Say "The Supreme Court Is Wrong?" when it doesn't rule their way?
  GarfieldJL
04-26-2007, 9:30 PM
#8
The Patriot Act is legal due to the fact we're at war and it has to keep being renewed. The Constitution does allow for things like the Patriot Act when we're at a state of war. This is why Supreme Court Justices are in for Life, so their jobs aren'...  [Read More]
Page: 32 of 33