Note: LucasForums Archive Project
The content here was reconstructed by scraping the Wayback Machine in an effort to restore some of what was lost when LF went down. The LucasForums Archive Project claims no ownership over the content or assets that were archived on archive.org.

This project is meant for research purposes only.

Civ Bonuses: Big, small or what?

Page: 1 of 1
 Darth_Venage
09-17-2001, 8:43 PM
#1
Personally, I think the civ bonuses should be existant, but small. Your opinions?
 Tie Guy
09-17-2001, 9:07 PM
#2
I think that they should be big. It helps add variety to the civs, and it makes playing different civs more valuable.
 Admiral viper
09-18-2001, 12:15 AM
#3
me to tie guy like I personally (don't yell at me for my opinion)think that the empire should be the strongest civ,but I think the others should be pretty strong to
 Cup_A_Jabba
09-18-2001, 12:27 AM
#4
In response to admiral viper's comment about Empire being the strongest. Are you talking about (if you have ever played), Starcraft where protoss is the "strongest" yet all of the other races have something that can counter that strength??( such as terran and E.M.P??) And in response to the civ bonuses, I think they should be really really big!! :) It adds a lot to the gameplay!! well, thats all
 Paladin
09-18-2001, 10:28 AM
#5
I think the bonuses should be moderate and
by the way the Empire will not be the strongest civ.,
All of them will be balanced fairly. Whats wrong with u imp people.
 Darth_Venage
09-18-2001, 3:35 PM
#6
maybe some of you misunderstood the question. All civs will, of course, be balanced. But, there will still(to MY knowledge) be certain civ bonuses. Do you think those bonuses(FOR EACH CIV, NOT JUST ONE) should be big, medium, small, or just not be existant?
Page: 1 of 1