Why do you think that I got mad? All I did was define overclocking and explain that a 486 can't be overclocked to where it performs equivalently to a Pentium 150, and I see nothing in my post that would indicate I was irritated. You really don't need to tell me you don't know much about overclocking; your "you can overclock a 486 to a Pentium 150" post was evidence enough in itself. I don't understand why you'd even comment if you know nothing about the topic, but you do it so often that arguing about it is pointless.
If your rommmate already knows how to overclock a computer (though if he thinks a 486 can be ramped up where it rivals a P150 in performance, I'd be a bit hesitant to trust anything he says...), why not just ask him? It seems rather pointless to ask on a message board rather than talk to someone in person, but whatever.
This article (
http://www.tomshardware.com/guides/overclocking/index.html) at Tom's Hardware describes the process in-depth, so I'd suggest looking at it if you are planning on trying to overclock. Overclocking a newer CPU is a bit different, so if you're trying to overclock a Pentium II, Celeron, or anything newer, I can give more precise directions for what needs to be done for those CPU's.
[This message has been edited by Argath (edited March 05, 2000).]