Here's a matter we haven't brought up yet: <font color=red>aerodynamics</font>. When we look at it like that, we find that the A-wing's fuselage is shaped in a manner known as a lifting body...that is to say, the body of the spacecraft is shaped in such a way that air flowing over the top will take longer than that going under, which causes lift. If dropped into a wind tunnel, a model A-wing would generate some lift as it 'flew along.'
An X-wing, however, has the same aerodynamic profile of, say, celery.
http://www.roguesquadron.net/forums/biggrin.gif) The X-wings in RS must have some kind of magic levitation generators, because those flat wings of theirs are going nowhere but down...and four engines in back only make it fall faster.
Now, the Naboo starfighter looks aerodynamic enough, but its shape would actually be better suited to a water craft. Seriously--stick propellors on the engines, and you have Jacques Cousteau's personal submarine dragster.
http://www.roguesquadron.net/forums/smile.gif)
An aerodynamic nightmare would be the airspeeder. Pardon this, but unless that profile were modified, it would be more of an airstaller...
And the Y-wing? Maybe if the cockpit module were blasted clear of the rest of the ship it could generate some lift.
http://www.roguesquadron.net/forums/biggrin.gif)
Let's see...the Millenium Falcon would cut the air pretty well, but its shape is too symmetrical to cause any lift. Sorry, Chewie. The TIE interceptor would have the same problem. You know what would have a pretty good chance of flying? The V-wing--too bad its repulsor lift keeps it on the ground.
http://www.roguesquadron.net/forums/frown.gif)
Let the debate begin...now
http://www.roguesquadron.net/forums/biggrin.gif)
------------------
"I sought the true nature of reality but discovered instead the real nature of truth."
--Thrustweasel of Earth