Note: LucasForums Archive Project
The content here was reconstructed by scraping the Wayback Machine in an effort to restore some of what was lost when LF went down. The LucasForums Archive Project claims no ownership over the content or assets that were archived on archive.org.

This project is meant for research purposes only.

Single player addtions

Page: 1 of 1
 JediTACC
06-06-2001, 5:38 PM
#1
Does the QIII:TA engine allow for single player add-on missions? One of the big things about JK and MotS was that you could make new single player levels, and some that have been made are very well done, rivaling LEC's work.

This would be avery sad ommision (sp??) from any Jedi Knight game...

JediTACC
 CaptainRAVE
06-06-2001, 5:52 PM
#2
It sure does......raven might even give us an option to add mods and levels through an in game menu.....they do take our views and opinions into account after all!
 CaptainRAVE
06-06-2001, 5:52 PM
#3
We can trust raven! :D
 StormHammer
06-06-2001, 11:02 PM
#4
Personally, I'm hoping they are going to include the Random Mission Generator thingy that they have promised for Soldier Of Fortune 2. It's supposed to generate a level with a mission objective, which is different each time. That would add a lot to the extended play of JKII...
 Red_XIIII
06-06-2001, 11:04 PM
#5
Mods were in Ef, so it probably will be in Df3
 Ki-Adi-Mundi
06-06-2001, 11:31 PM
#6
It's not DF3 silly red. It's jk2. hehe

Isn't SOF2 supposed to be Single Player only when it's released? If so, I'll bet that JkII has a weak to average single player and a strong Multiplayer.

If that's so, then there should be a lot of good single player missions to come out. Eventually. I hope anyway.
 Aragorn
06-06-2001, 11:40 PM
#7
If JKO will have a weak SP I'll just hate it...
I honestly don't think it will though.
 matt--
06-07-2001, 2:03 AM
#8
Every game nowadays needs a multiplay mode.
 Letalis
06-07-2001, 3:33 AM
#9
Every game nowadays needs a multiplay mode.

That's very true, but Aragorn, put your fears to rest, with the history of the Star Wars universe at their finger tips, even if they tried they couldn't make a bad SP. The story line will be awesome! :)
 Archie
06-07-2001, 5:01 AM
#10
That's not true. Common misconception. See "bits and pieces" thread.
 GonkH8er
06-07-2001, 5:35 AM
#11
yeah, he's right. max payne wont have mp apparently, and it will be a damn fine game..........
 Letalis
06-07-2001, 9:21 AM
#12
Ok, sure you can get by without MP, but how many would want to?
Almost entirely these days replayability is based upon MP. Yes, I know there's exceptions, you'll probably make a huge list too :) But think about how many games you play, and how many do you play online or MP? ;)
 GonkH8er
06-07-2001, 9:32 AM
#13
hrmmm i spose.....


but good multiplayer does not a complete game make!
 Letalis
06-07-2001, 9:37 AM
#14
Unless of course you're talking about a MMORPG or the like... :)
 GonkH8er
06-07-2001, 9:44 AM
#15
oh! mr smarty pants thinks he can make me look silly!


well, does that mean that people without a multiplayer connection CANT experience a good game? eh? eh?

and dont gimme that hotseat split screen crap :)
 Letalis
06-07-2001, 10:25 AM
#16
Not at all, I was talking about replayability. ;)
But seeing that you mention it, Heroes I, II, III, all hot-seat, all brilliant. Also Warlords I, II, III, and Darklord Rising were hot-seat, and very populour! :D

As for split screen, ever play Settlers 2?
Oh, the geologists were so cute! :)
 GonkH8er
06-07-2001, 10:33 AM
#17
oh be quiet :)
 Letalis
06-07-2001, 10:34 AM
#18
Yes Mum... :p
 GonkH8er
06-07-2001, 10:48 AM
#19
ur cruising for a bruising, let me tell you!


;)
 Syndrix
06-07-2001, 12:27 PM
#20
No Gonk, Letalis is pending for a bending. Hehehe (I hope people get that joke)
 CaptainRAVE
06-07-2001, 4:18 PM
#21
It would be good if they could have a random mission generator. But as we've seen with many games like SFC2, SFC and HG they just arnt that random. And after a while get quite tiresom!
Page: 1 of 1