At-At and MTT same stats that is just hilarious since a at-at could kick a mtt's ass, what do u think about the matter

What does it matter, the game has to be balanced.

well arn't the mechs of the empire supposed to be better than that of other civs?

After upgrades, definatly :D

the hvy at-at has exact stats as hvy Mtt

Without upgrades... The empire has the best mechs, b/c they have the best upgrades for mechs...


Join my GB game, viper: 24.67.1.73

The Empire and TF mechs got rated by MFO as the same, probably becasue they're both pretty good.

just wondering...why does the MTT have a crew of battledroids inside? why not just have the whole thing controlled by one computer?? :confused:

Because it is desighned to be a transport

i thought the MTT was a tank

Originally posted by Maul403
i thought the MTT was a tank

Nope, they are the big transports that carry the troops into the final battle at the end of TPM. Remember?

Anyways, I asked the same thing, why not just have the tank droid controlled rather than having another droid control it?

Yup, MTT is a transport . The TF tanks are called AATs (Amored Assault Tank I think ??) .

well when i make a scenario i'll make the :atat: much stronger

lol so the MTT has the same stats as the ATAT?

Originally posted by darth_beast
well when i make a scenario i'll make the :atat: much stronger

Well, you can't change the statistics of the units in the editor, unless you want to set up a trigger that will upgrade them.

And yes, the MTT and the ATAT have the same stats, just as the ATAT and the "steadfast" have the same base stats.

Will the Scenario Editor have as much flexibility option and function-wise as the SC campaign editor?