Note: LucasForums Archive Project
The content here was reconstructed by scraping the Wayback Machine in an effort to restore some of what was lost when LF went down. The LucasForums Archive Project claims no ownership over the content or assets that were archived on archive.org.

This project is meant for research purposes only.

snow speeder

Page: 1 of 1
 Zygomaticus
10-07-2001, 6:52 PM
#1
does it make sense that the snow speeder just has an attack of 1
 Tie Guy
10-07-2001, 7:06 PM
#2
Does it? i didnt notice.

Anyways, it does make sense coz they want them to be ant-mech units only.
 xwing guy
10-07-2001, 7:14 PM
#3
You sure you didn't miss read that?
 Cup_A_Jabba
10-07-2001, 7:34 PM
#4
ya, the thing about that is it is really good against mechs. if you ever noticed the pummel, it has 2 attack. but, against walls or buildings it does almost 100 damage I've noticed, so don't think that just because the snow speeder says 1 damage that it actually does 1 damage. I've used it several times, and it does work really well. Against A-A (anti-air) units. I like to shoot and run. so they can't hit me :D :D :D . so there u have it! Hope i helped a little bit at least.
 Eets
10-07-2001, 7:48 PM
#5
There is strength in masses. Though the snow speeder has only 1 attack, if you have lots of em, you can wipe out anybody pretty easily.
 Luke Skywalker
10-07-2001, 9:12 PM
#6
Originally posted by mijtechboy
There is strength in masses. Though the snow speeder has only 1 attack, if you have lots of em, you can wipe out anybody pretty easily.

100% correct
 xwing guy
10-07-2001, 10:50 PM
#7
Also against AT-ATs airspeeders use their tow cables on them to take them down easiy.
 Luke Skywalker
10-07-2001, 10:57 PM
#8
thats what I hate about AT-ATs they are so vunerable there. Thats why they should have AA.
 Zygomaticus
10-07-2001, 11:14 PM
#9
will they use cables to disble at ats in te game too??:confused:
 Luke Skywalker
10-07-2001, 11:22 PM
#10
Im not sure the animation would look coll though.:)
 Maul403
10-07-2001, 11:26 PM
#11
thats what I hate about AT-ATs they are so vunerable there. Thats why they should have AA.

hmmm...if ATAT had AA then ppl would complain about IT being too strong...so just send a couple of AA units taggin along with it
 Luke Skywalker
10-07-2001, 11:29 PM
#12
I didnt say the AA had to reload fast....
 Dagobahn Eagle
10-07-2001, 11:37 PM
#13
I'm not really sure why the AT-ATs do not have Anti-air in any of those RTS games. Not in FoCom (only as a special weapon :barf: ), not in GB. Remember, in ESB they roasted those snowspeeders. If they're afraid of destroying game balance, just punch up the price of the AT-AT.
 GhostKeeper
10-07-2001, 11:55 PM
#14
if at-ats had aa it would be impossible to take them down. all u need to do its put some aa guys in the at-at and when air comes unload them. you cant expect 1 unit to be able to kill everything and not have one weakness :)
 Hockey_Beast
10-08-2001, 3:11 AM
#15
I love those guys
 Luke Skywalker
10-08-2001, 10:33 AM
#16
But in the movies dont the have aa?
 Eets
10-08-2001, 10:36 AM
#17
It's been discussed before: Snowspeeders will not have tow cables to destroy the AT-AT or any other mech for that matter.
 Luke Skywalker
10-08-2001, 11:09 AM
#18
Originally posted by mijtechboy
It's been discussed before: Snowspeeders will not have tow cables to destroy the AT-AT or any other mech for that matter.

Yah well I can see that because the animation would stress out the engine,:(
 Eets
10-08-2001, 11:29 AM
#19
:D Now you're catching on!
Page: 1 of 1