Which one is better GTk-1.4.0 or GTk-1.3.12

Note: LucasForums Archive Project

The content here was reconstructed by scraping the Wayback Machine in an effort to restore some of what was lost when LF went down. The LucasForums Archive Project claims no ownership over the content or assets that were archived on archive.org.

This project is meant for research purposes only.

Page: 1 of 1

KASHMIRS

12-30-2004, 10:34 AM
#1

I just want to know is there any diference?

wedge2211

12-30-2004, 6:13 PM
#2

Later versions are usually better/more stable/etc. Some even have whole brand-spanking-new features.

Ockniel

12-30-2004, 10:47 PM
#3

does 1.3.12 have the caulk tool? cause life is so much easier with the caulk tool :)

Nokill

12-31-2004, 5:10 AM
#4

thay both have th same stuf only 1.4 is more stabel ;)

Ockniel

12-31-2004, 9:41 AM
#5

well then, 1.4.0 I declare! 1.4.0!!!

Nokill

12-31-2004, 10:00 AM
#6

*claps* wohoo 1.4.0 :p

Shadow_stone

12-31-2004, 2:28 PM
#7

Originally posted by wedge2211
Later versions are usually better/more stable/etc. Some even have whole brand-spanking-new features.

except i HATE 1.5 lol

Ockniel

01-01-2005, 12:38 AM
#8

theres a 1.5?!?!?!?

Pahricida

01-01-2005, 5:17 AM
#9

Yeah it's beta though

http://zerowing.idsoftware.com/files/radiant/nightly/1.5/GtkRadiant-1.5.0-2004-12-05.msi)

Shadow_stone

01-01-2005, 7:19 AM
#10

don't bother getting it though, stick with 1.4

Ockniel

01-01-2005, 8:12 AM
#11

what are the differences?

Emon

01-05-2005, 6:29 AM
#12

I haven't used Radiant since 1.3. I imagine 1.5 has some of SPoG's experimental features, like well, his new CSG subtract that doesn't suck, the completely new brush manipulation and all that. I used one of his alpha builds a year or two ago, it was like Radiant + 3ds max. Which = sex.

Lil Killa

01-05-2005, 2:01 PM
#13

ooo Emon is back?

Jedi_Vogel

01-08-2005, 2:07 PM
#14

did someone say that CSG subtract DOESN'T suck?

riiiiiight.

Page: 1 of 1