ever notice a weird icon in your lowe right menus and you dont know where it came from?
ever notice those new search tool bars you never use?
its spy ware that can send pop up ad after pop up ad all day long!
it also lets guys look into your PC!
if our PCs get too much spyware, they get so bundled down, they dont run anymore!
(fortunatly there is "Adaware" and "Spybot search and destroy" at download.com)
they have NO RIGHT to invade our personel space! WE paid for our PCs, we decide what to install and NOT to install! if the government can shut down Napster and detect and punish people for downloading a song, they can track down hackers and arrest them too!
if spyware and popups make you sick like it does me, write your complaints here!
give YOUR opinion on the spyware problem!
Originally posted by kipperthefrog
they can track down hackers and arrest them too!
and they do. But they usually don't go after anyone responsible for spyware. Why? I'm not sure.
*raises hand*
Though, with a good firewall and the newest windows security updates, it shouldn't be too much of a problem.
why hate spyware and pop-ups?
these little gimmicks cant do anything against their existence, they where created to do a job and they do it. they are brave softwarebits who do everything their creator wants them to do.
why not (a) hate the creator instead?
why not (b) get a clue, wake up and realize that the internet is the internet, which is open for everyone on this planet?
i mean you do close your door, even if you're at home, don't you?
what seems to be the bigger issue, the spyware itself, or the fact that spyware can actually do what it is doing? why is there the possibility to hijack browsers without any notice? why is there the possibility that others can get a hold of my personal data without my permission?
spyware a problem? niente. the problem is that these things are possible without that i ever was asked if i want it so nor was i informed that it will be like that. and that's clearly not the fault of spyware or any hacker.
Raising hand, and I'm sure.
Runs to go and run Adaware, its been a while.
originaly posted by breton!
Though, with a good firewall and the newest windows security updates, it shouldn't be too much of a problem.
i heard of this patch too! my dad told me! he also said it works, but HALF YOUR PROGRAMS DONT WORK!
Originally posted by kipperthefrog
ever notice a weird icon in your lowe right menus and you dont know where it came from?
ever notice those new search tool bars you never use?
No.
Don't use ie, take precautions and they're not a problem...
And obviously users require some kind of common sense.
iamtrip, I agree. I use Netscape, not IE and I don't run into problems. I still take precautions though.
THANKS GUYS!
My dad recently said not to use IE! I see what you mean now!
I fail to see how this is a debate, since pretty much everyone dislikes having spyware on their systems. Maybe you wanted to talk generally about Internet security? (which, by the way, is an oxymoron ;))
Man, I love spyware. It slows my computer down, takes my browser to porn, AND gives me wierd programs that I can't delete!
Seriously, who didn't pick up on that sarcasm?
I don't get them. I use Zonealarm, AdAware, and, most importantly, Opera 7.5.
The most annoying thing about the internet for me is the spam that comes into my email. It seems that I am a very important person since I have dignitaries and diplomats from places like Nigeria writing me for assistance on a constant basis.
Originally posted by SkinWalker
It seems that I am a very important person since I have dignitaries and diplomats from places like Nigeria writing me for assistance on a constant basis.
LOL. Please excuse the thump while I fall out of my chair.
If I'm such an important person because I can lead a massive rebellion and gain millions and millions after freeing up an iced bank account in some tiny Asian country not on the map, find some other way to contact me than email.
[/sarcasm]
And what's with all the crap about mortgages and sx enhancing things (excuse that but I get about 10 of each a day...kinda pisses me off)...? I'm 12, I don't need that stuff!
Originally posted by DarthBuzzard
I'm 12, I don't need that stuff!
You mean you're not stocking up on Viagra™?
The spammers spell it \/iagra to beat the filters. I just set mine for "agra." :)
I thought I filtered that out last year with iagra but they still beat it. also rtg for mortgage, but that still slips through...
You mean you're not stocking up on Viagra™?
Another please excuse the interruption while I fall out of my chair.
Since switching to Firefox all my problems have gone away.
Originally posted by SkinWalker
The spammers spell it \/iagra to beat the filters. I just set mine for "agra." :)
mozilla thunderbird has a good adaptive filter. it catches 95% of the spam i recieve. and i never open/read mails from addresses/domains i don't know or i am not in contact with, i just check the "junk" switch and it's gone for good..
furthermore, if i ever recieve spam from the same (crappy) domain twice, i'll add it to the manual filter, so it will be deleted on the server instead of being downloaded.
and yes zonealarm is a good choice, since i use it adaware and spybot are "unused", just negative checks from time to time.
also a good idea is not to use ie what will automatically close 50% of the security holes. the netscape and mozilla suites are far to SLOW so i stick to the standalone mozilla firefox at the moment.. i could check opera but i really have no reason for that.. ;D
using linux will solve the rest of the problems.. :) ok, there are bugs sometimes but i mean.. the difference is the policy: with linux nobody comes in except you say it, while on windows everyone comes in except you install tons of (sometimes expensive) software that protects you or install 100 megs of patches which arent necessarily healthy for your system's stability.
however i am not saying windows is a bad os, it has a lot to offer and it has really improved, but it is not secure until you do something.
Internet Explorer was more pourous than a giant butterfly net that just got perforated by a .50 cal up close in the middle of a meteor shower. You'd think Bill Gates would be embarrassed to put something like that out for the public.
Well after 5 versions of windows, I don't think he suffers from bouts of a bad conscience.
The reason there is nothing done about spyware / addware. Is that people are making money with it. If someone wasn't making money off it nobody would do it.
If 1,000 people get pop ups / adds and if 15 or 20 out of the 1,000 actually respond to them. Then someone made a profit. People who make profit have some say in what gets done in Congress. Congressman aren't going to vote for bills or legislature that hurts the profit of a company or person that helps fund their election campaign.
That's why stuff like the patriot act get passed and stuff like pop ups get to wait another turn.:o
That's true. They make a bit of money.
Strange enough, I get almost zero spam. Nicht, nothing.
Though occasionnaly I get a idiotic chain letter forward by a firend...Used to get tons of those...then send out ranting e-mail where I insulted their stupidity for spamming and slowing down hotmail's servers with O*(?*(?&%*(&? chain letters...
True you can avoid a lot of SPAM. Surfing the net is kind of like picking up a hooker. Looking at the wrong type of sights or Downloading programs. Eventually your are going to get an E-net STD.
Be knowledgeable about the net and the sights you go to and the things you download and your chances of getting viruses and SPAM decrease.;)
There is actually a US law in consideration at the moment to ban spyware... the problem is that it can be hard to define (as many software packages actually contain other sub programmes) and that they can hide behind the "but we warned you in the EULA" excuse.
I actually think that the biggest threat to computer users (except maybe viruses) is EULAs. If you think about them logically they are totally pointless.
- They include things like "i won't copy this" which are all covered by existing laws.
- NO ONE reads them.
- Even if you do read them you need to be a lawyer to understand them.
- It would take forever to scan every one in detail for each bit of software.
- You have to unwrap and start installing the software to get to read them. (and usually then can't return the software if it is opened)
- They can even be used to do stupid things like ban you from selling software that YOU have paid for.
- If you actually READ them you realise you aren't buying the software, you are buying a blank cd and the license to use the software.... which means they can control what you do with it as YOU DONT OWN IT.
- You don't see warnings of this before you buy them, but they are displayed like CDs or DVDs or any other product, and when you buy those you don't expect that you aren't actually BUYING them, just the license to use them, so why should software be different?
Sidebar: In my humble opinion they aren't legal as they allow companies to add terms & conditions to the sale AFTER it has been completed. But a court just rendered them legal (insane decision) so what do i know.
It is these unreadable EULAs that allow people to get away with dodgy software practices like spyware, as they confuse and allow them to disguise them.
There should be a standard, plain english, government approved EULA that all software uses, with clearly marked parts to declare all variations (bundled software, etc). This would work in the same way to the need for clear marking of content on video games.
So you look on the back of the box and it has, say, 3 symbol boxes that contain:
Single User, No Copying, 3 Applications
or
Single Computer, 5 Copys, 1 Application
as big colourful symbols.
When you install it you get an installation screen with the same big symbols, and clicking on each one would take you to the appropriate government regulated EULA agreement.
The application one would list all applications that would be installed.
Companies could then just select the appropriate set of (common, well written) symbols/terms that they wanted, consumers would be clearer and know what they were buying, and legalities like piracy would be handled by the existing laws, not some complex, unique EULA that noone reads...
sorry for the rant...:D
Originally posted by toms
There is actually a US law in consideration at the moment to ban spyware...Kind of like the law in consideration to make DVD/CD burners, Tape Recorders, and such illegal?
Originally posted by toms
the problem is that it can be hard to define It's pretty easy to define. Anything that monitors what you do or adds unwanted programs to your computer that do unwanted things. It's only complicated, because someone is making it so.
You can't ban spyware. This isn't a local problem. If they ban it in the US a server in China could still contain spyware. Makes no difference. The net is without frontiers.
Who is that in your avatar lukeiamyourdad?
Originally posted by Cosmos Jack
Kind of like the law in consideration to make DVD/CD burners, Tape Recorders, and such illegal?
Not really, more like the can-spam law.
(which ok, was a load of rubbish, and actually had the effect of legalising some forms of spam... so i don't have high hopes. I thought i'd mention it though. the problem is the legislators don't understand the subjects...)
Originally posted by Cosmos Jack
It's pretty easy to define. Anything that monitors what you do or adds unwanted programs to your computer that do unwanted things. It's only complicated, because someone is making it so.
Many helpful programs monitor what you do (such as antivirus, firewalls, search bars etc..) and many programs add additional programs that help them to do their job. Some of those might be "unwanted" if you don't need the particular feature they provide, but that wouldn't make them spyware.
Even defining "unwanted" is very hard in legal terms, as if it provides a service transparently in the background then how do i know if it is wanted or not?
EG: ATI media centre - when you install this it is actually about 8 programmes, plus about 20 other background programmes and drivers (schedulers, audio/video devices, codecs, updaters) most of which the average user wouldn't know were running at startup or in the background. Most the average user wouldn't even know what they do. Would that be unwanted? Some stuff they do want wouldn't work without it. But some of it provides features i never use. I suppose it could ask you about installing every bit, but that would make installation long and confusing for most users, and lead to a lot of installations that don't work.
I'm not saying it isn't do-able, just that it isn't easy.
Originally posted by Loopster
Who is that in your avatar lukeiamyourdad?
PMs do exist.
I don't suppose you could just tell me? ;)
Originally posted by toms
Everything you typed here. Your reasoning sounds more like excuses then reasons. If you want to continue to philosophize on why it is hard (to make spyware and malicious programs illegal) then that is fine with me, but leaves little to discus. Leaves you sounding like the spokesperson for the Spyware guys.
This is what I got from your post.
"If you don't know it's there and don't know what it does how do you know you don't want it?"
"Most people are too dumb to understand what most of the programs they install or download unknowingly do. So why tell them and have them know they are doing it?"
"Anti Virus software is the same as Virus software, because they both monitor what you do. So they are the same and very hard to distinguish between."
That is basically what your statements conveyed to me.
This is new on CNN
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/10/08/tech.spyware.reut/index.html)
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/10/07/internet.spyware.ap/index.html)
Originally posted by toms
Many helpful programs monitor what you do (such as antivirus, firewalls, search bars etc..) and many programs add additional programs that help them to do their job. Some of those might be "unwanted" if you don't need the particular feature they provide, but that wouldn't make them spyware.
Even defining "unwanted" is very hard in legal terms, as if it provides a service transparently in the background then how do i know if it is wanted or not?
an anti virus software should not monitor what I DO it should only monitor the files which are opened, written whatever.
a firewall should monitor accesses from and to my pc/network.
i also cannot see any reason why any software i start should automatically try to connect to the internet (yup, i control my firewall not vice versa ;D), except I want it so.
it's surely not spyware but it's where it begins. a program should do (automatically or not) what i say, not what i don't say or don't deny, because that doesnt means "yes, do it" it's UNWANTED because i don't want something to 'control' my pc.
a function i dont use? ok. a scheduler service? no problem with that. but why is it active although i never "scheduled" anything??
EG: ATI media centre - when you install this it is actually about 8 programmes, plus about 20 other background programmes and drivers (schedulers, audio/video devices, codecs, updaters) most of which the average user wouldn't know were running at startup or in the background. Most the average user wouldn't even know what they do. Would that be unwanted?
the "average user" wants a 'painting software' and 'not something that runs in the background', gets a media centre and something that runs in the background. there are two typical average users: the one who always clicks "ok" and the one who clicks "cancel". the average user is the reason for "my files"-folders and the "if you want to uninstall software, use the software item in the control panel"-messages.
Some stuff they do want wouldn't work without it. But some of it provides features i never use. I suppose it could ask you about installing every bit, but that would make installation long and confusing for most users, and lead to a lot of installations that don't work.
on the other hand you have 20 programs started during startup, and instead of ONE 'longer' process of installing you now have every boot slow as a snail.
also, again, it very depends to how the setup is programmed or designed.
and it's "use your system" not "be used by it". if you dont take the time to deal with a "customized" setup, you have to deal with the standard one for the "average user".
Originally posted by Cosmos Jack
[B]Leaves you sounding like the spokesperson for the Spyware guys.
What ? How? WHy? do you understant the words that are coming out of my mouth? :confused: :eek:
What i am saying is that you need somthing more than "its illegal to have software that does bad things" as a law. And that is seems to me to be very hard to define what "bad things" would be.
I guess you could define it as "something that is installed without asking", but most spyware DOES ask or inform, it just does in hidden deep in a legal jargon filled EULA somewhere where most people don't notice it.
Any law would NEED to help those who know NOTHING about computers, as anyone techie enough to know ABOUT spyware doesn't need to be protected anywhere near as much as those who know about it.
Almost every program i have tried to access the internet to check for updates, it sure makes things easier, but needs a way to be turned off if needed, but it doesn't mean they are "bad programs".
You would think spam would have been easy to define and legislate against, but the can-spam act doesn't seem to have helped much, and has made matters worse in some cases... i wouldn expect much better from this law if it happens.
I don't see why you think i am defending spyware, i'm just saying it isn't as easy to define and legislate against as you'd think. I bet most of those that I would define as spyware would deny it completely. How would i prove that I was right and they were wrong?
Yes I hate spyware, Gator and Gain are two of the worst and they seem to go together. Its when they start putting desktop icons to pay per min porn that you have to wory. I used to have a big problem but with zone alarm, AVG and firefox as my browser I don't seem to have any problems. yet.
Spyware should be treated as seriously as viruses as there is a fine line between some of them, these as*****s people should be caught and strung up by their B you know whats.
I agree with Lukeiamyourdad.
Spy ware is here to stay unless you can create software to fight or manage it when it comes in. The problem is inherent in the cookies and the way they work and the basic way the web works in its international, instant and ever-changing format.
*raises hand*
*raises hand*
*raises hand*
*raises hand*
*raises hand*
*raises hand*
*raises hand*
*raises hand*
*raises hand*
*raises hand*
*raises hand*
*raises hand*
*raises hand*
*raises hand*
*raises hand*
*raises hand*
*raises hand*
*raises hand*
So what do we DO about it?
Do we protest? Is there anything else we can do?
Nope. Except for Ad-aware, SpyBot S&D an other anti-spyware programs there's not much you can do. Laws won't change anything unless there is one in every country in the world. It also needs to be enforced seriously.
I recently had to reformat because of spyware that wouldn't die.
We really need some kind of internet police who find spyware and shut down the host, or whatever...
Seriously, what is the satisfaction of installing useless crap on people's computers, and slowing it down with other garbage?
Originally posted by TK-8252
Seriously, what is the satisfaction of installing useless crap on people's computers, and slowing it down with other garbage?
Not the satisfaction you speak of. Their purpose is not to slow your computer down to a crawl; it is to steal information about you, your surfing habits, your account information, and make use of them to fill their pockets.
Originally posted by Druid Bremen
Not the satisfaction you speak of. Their purpose is not to slow your computer down to a crawl; it is to steal information about you, your surfing habits, your account information, and make use of them to fill their pockets.
But what comes from the self-installing toolbars and stuff? How does that benefit the spies?
Originally posted by TK-8252
I recently had to reformat because of spyware that wouldn't die.
We really need some kind of internet police who find spyware and shut down the host, or whatever...
Seriously, what is the satisfaction of installing useless crap on people's computers, and slowing it down with other garbage?
Internet police are a very bad idea. They rank up there with the "thought police" in my book. Yes, spy ware is a problem, but it I don't seem to have a big problem with it. People don't believe me when I tell them that, so I simply tell them that they are doing something wrong. I will share you my secrets. Here goes.
I have two e-mail addresses, one I pass out to people that I know and actually like and don't mind it if they send e-mails to me. I ask them not to pass it out. When I send out e-mails I always blind cc e-mails as a curtesy. I expect the same. I delete e-mails that have a fw: in the subject line, I ignore chain letters (especially the ones that promise money if you send it right away or the ones that say "this really works"). My second e-mail address is a garbage address like a hot mail account. I check it regularly and use it to sign up for things on the net. It gets all of my garbage mail and mass mail. In fact I check it daily. It has a great filter on it and I can get to it anywhere on the net.
I also use an antivirus software and I use Adaware regularly. I have a firewall set up too. If you say that you do all of this then you must be doing something wrong. Also, if you set one of those "fun" icon bars on your e-mail/browser, they are used as spyware. Get rid of them. News groups, news letters, etc., will pass your e-mail out. Signing up your e-mail for free stuff contests is a bad idea too.
If you have DSL or a cable hook up where your Internet connection is on all of the time, make sure you have a good firewall set up.
It's not much of a secret. I myself only use a single address but I'm careful about it. I almost never have spam. That and I kinda yelled at some friends calling them stupid because they sent me chain letters.
I could have been nice but I was pissed at their lack of logic.
Do all what Nairb said and for god's sake, STOP USING IE.
Originally posted by lukeiamyourdad
Do all what Nairb said and for god's sake, STOP USING IE.
Yes, stop using IE, I forgot that one too, thanks Lukeiamyourdad. I use Netscape, its better anyway, IMO.
Something has to be done. It's got to stop somewhere. I do not want to see any kind of internet police. I like the unrestricted access to (available) information. But the popups, the spyware, spam. I just don't know what the solution would be given the world wide reach of the world wide web.
I agree, that there is no simple solution to the problem. Nobody wants an internet police to be created. The problem is that with Spam, popups and spy ware is that these things make money for people. Therefore the real way to stop them is stop their ability to make money. Once these entities no longer make money they are no longer valid. That is how you stop it. Now, the question is, how do you do that? One way is to make them illegal and charge ridiculously high fines, but that is next to impossible to do because of freedom of speech issues and the fact that it is nearly impossible to find out how is doing it. Plus it is very costly to police this. If this could be done then there would be no drug problem.
That would work if the offender were here in the United States. But how would you hold a company accountable to those fines if the server was located say in Russia or some third world type country?
You can't its impossible to hold an entity responsible for crimes outside of your jurisdiction. Thus the problem. This is also why fines will not solve the issue.
I believe it needs to be treated like a social issue. People need to be educated on the hows and whys of Spam/Pop-ups/Spyware, etc. Then they need to be offered methods of protection.
Spam & Spyware are like STDs... by practicing safe hex, you can avoid them :cool:
I do, however, think this educational process is happening... otherwise we wouldn't be discussing it here.
You are probably right. The ignorance of people is what makes these things work the best. They find the people that are unaware and then exploit them. It is the nature of this ugly beast.